×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

(OP)
When I have designed straight shaft piers in the past, I've added what is basically uplift using the compression SF to the allowable load obtained from Agallow since that compression skin friction is adding to the pier's resistance to applied loads. (i.e. Pallow = Agallow*(Π*D*(penetration into bearing stratum - top of skin friction layer)*SFcompression)

In the case of an underreamed pier, does all of allowable load resistance now come from the end bearing (Abellallow), or is that wall skin friction I typically add still an additive force? And of course, if you think I am way off in any aspect, please elaborate.

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

You typically get to use 1 or the other. Not both. That's due to the different levels of movement required to mobilize each different type of resistance. I.e. in order to mobilize the end bearing capacity, you will have overcome the skin friction.

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

Every belled pier I have ever designed was based on end bearing only. This was possibly a standard approach of the area in which I worked (south Texas) but was always recommended by the local geotechnical engineers in their reports. We typically had good blue shale about 30 to 40 feet down and expansive clays above that so perhaps the clays were not really conducive to skin friction.

There is also the concern that the excavation of the bell might disturb the soils directly above the bell so some length of shaft directly above the bell (if you were to add in skin friction) would be ignored.

Some of our geotech posters here might chime in but that is what I've seen.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

For belled piers, I would not recommend that you count on any skin friction. As others have said, use either end bearing or skin friction; not both.

Mike Lambert

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

(OP)
Thanks for all of your responses!

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

(OP)
Follow-up question:
I agree that skin friction in compression being neglected in terms of resisting applied axial loads is a good practice.

What about those that use the skin friction in tension to resist the uplift forces due to soil swelling? Does anyone agree that the amount of pier below the required embedment into the bearing strata/stable zone can be used in conjunction with the skin friction in tension to resist the applied uplift force? Furthermore, can the amount of bell outside of the shaft diameter (i.e. Π/4[db2-d2) in conjunction with the skin friction in tension be added (or is there some geometry regarding the angle of the bell ceiling involved)?

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

I would look at using the amount of soil to be lifted by the bell as the resisting mechanism in that case. ANSI/ASAE EP486.1 has a pretty good uplift calculation for situations like this. specifically clause 8.3.2.1

RE: Underreamed (Belled) Piers and Skin Friction

I have had geotechnical engineers allow for some friction component in addition to the end bearing component (depending on the soil type).

It's worth asking the question.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources