I have two identical holes on center line drilled on opposite ends of a part. One hole is datum A Ø.189/.195 and the other is the feature under consideration, also Ø.189/.195 with a position requirement of φ|Ø.002(M)|A(M)|. We are trying to verify conformance by using the tightest fitting gage pins in each hole, placing the pin in Datum A in the rollers of a concentricity gage with the indicator tip on the pin placed inserted into the feature under consideration. Using this method, I know we can add the bonus tolerance from the feature calculated by (Øgagepin-.189) to the positional tolerance of .002 and get up to .008. Can we also add the datum shift as well calculated by (Øgagepin[A]-.189) for a potential total positional tolerance of .014? My instinct says NO! But this has sparked a healthy debate and I wanted to get some feedback. We would prefer to check this with a functional gage or CMM, but that is just not in the cards right now.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
In the digital era, manufacturing is constantly transforming. This includes the automotive industry, where product lifecycles are becoming shorter in order to differentiate and meet the latest consumer tastes. Download Now
In 2017, ENGINEERING.com surveyed 151 product development professionals about how they manage product data. Our analysis focused on the types of systems used, how they were used, and the correlation between system types and common product design failures. Download Now