I have two identical holes on center line drilled on opposite ends of a part. One hole is datum A Ø.189/.195 and the other is the feature under consideration, also Ø.189/.195 with a position requirement of φ|Ø.002(M)|A(M)|. We are trying to verify conformance by using the tightest fitting gage pins in each hole, placing the pin in Datum A in the rollers of a concentricity gage with the indicator tip on the pin placed inserted into the feature under consideration. Using this method, I know we can add the bonus tolerance from the feature calculated by (Øgagepin-.189) to the positional tolerance of .002 and get up to .008. Can we also add the datum shift as well calculated by (Øgagepin[A]-.189) for a potential total positional tolerance of .014? My instinct says NO! But this has sparked a healthy debate and I wanted to get some feedback. We would prefer to check this with a functional gage or CMM, but that is just not in the cards right now.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
As products become increasingly complex, product lifecycle management (PLM) is steadily growing, with new solutions and companies entering the space. However, businesses seeking to implement PLM may still face issues in managing products across entire lifecycles. Download Now