×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

(OP)
I am designing a retaining wall but I cannot seem to find a straight answer on how to calculate the Kh factor. I have read about it on different sources and they all seem to say something different. This is what I have seen:

  • Kh = Sds/2.5
  • Kh = 0.5*PGA
  • Kh = PGA
  • Kh usually ranges from 0.5 to 0.3


  • Any thoughts. The project is in California, so there is high seismic activity.

    Thank you

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    Yup, there doesn't seem to be a real consensus on this subject as far as I can tell. My thoughts on the subject:

    1) My tendency is to lean towards the Sds/2.5.
    2) Retaining walls that are designed well for regular loading seem to have performed pretty well in earthquakes in the past.... Despite the fact that very few of them were designed for seismic loading.

    I'm glad the code is trying to define this concept better in recent cycles. Because there are projects where the retaining walls are pretty critical. That being said, for those projects (where liquifaction might be an issue or the entire site stability is based on a tall retaining wall) my tendency would be to let the geotech handle the wall.

    For the more boring conventional retaining walls that I've designed, my tendency is to believe that seismic design of these walls isn't truly necessary.

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    If you have a geotechnical report/guy on the job......this is a question he should be able to answer. (Well, you would hope so anyway.)

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    Google Mononobe Okabe plenty of design examples out there.

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    Well, there are a couple of variations on Mononabe Okabe that can be made.

    And, the fundamental question is what Kh to use as the basis for the M-O pressures? That's where the consensus seems to be lacking....

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    Quote:

    And, the fundamental question is what Kh to use as the basis for the M-O pressures? That's where the consensus seems to be lacking....

    Chapter 8 of Braja Das's 'Principle of Soil Dynamics' is devoted to this subject. If you look at just about all the comparisons they cite (between experimental and theoretical values) they are all off by a pretty significant factor. Fortunately, they have comparisons between some of those values in charts.

    Further complicating the matter is the fact the magnitude and distribution of the pressures on the wall depend on how the wall itself yields (i.e. rotation about the bottom, translation, or rotation about the top; Das addresses all 3 in the reference). You combine that with a large number of possible experimental input parameters (i.e. frequency input motion, etc) and you see why there isn't a consensus.

    That's why I suggested a few posts back to rely (if possible) on a Geotech's opinion (like we do so many other times). You can always fall back on that (if something goes wrong)......and back check it yourself to see if it makes sense.

    RE: Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall Design

    The city of Los Angeles has a policy statement on this: Link. In the absence of anything more official you could at least point to that. They take Kh = Sds/2.5.

    I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

    Red Flag This Post

    Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

    Red Flag Submitted

    Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
    The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

    Reply To This Thread

    Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

    Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


    Resources