INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Design of Huge RCB End Section

Design of Huge RCB End Section

(OP)
One of my coworkers dropped a Plan & Elevation on my desk of an RCB with some very custom end sections. I haven't ever seen anything like this before, but essentially the downstream end section has an 11' drop from the barrel to the apron, and the apron flowline is 3' or 4' below the existing channel flowline. The RCB barrel is 8' tall, so the wing will be about 20' tall at the barrel and slope down to about 5' or 6' at the end.

I'm sure terms vary depending on where you live, but what I call an end section is the wing walls and apron. Usually the apron runs the full length of the wings (and in between) and also acts as the footing for the wings.

I plan to analyze the the wings and apron as a U shaped concrete frame in the same way I would analyze an RCB as a rigid frame. This image from MODOT shows how I would apply the loads to an RCB. http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=Image:751.8.2...

My concern is how to apply the distributed load acting upwards against the bottom of the apron. Obviously I won't have any live load and will have the self weight of the wings and apron for DC2. I am not sure how to define the load applied to the bottom of the apron due to the earth pressure on the wings. I do it all the time for retaining walls, but this thing is double sided and that is throwing me off.

RE: Design of Huge RCB End Section

The only upward force on the apron would be the self weight of the apron and wings divided by the apron length. You won't apply vertical earth pressure to the apron, only horizontal to the wings unless the apron is going to be covered but that would probably be unconservative.

The ODOT standards were designed as an L shaped retaining wall and the toe length is iterated to satisfy a bearing pressure of 2ksf.

RE: Design of Huge RCB End Section

Whenever I've had to look at large box culvert wing walls with large aprons and/or skews I've always modeled the walls in a FEA program with the apron supported on springs with a suitable subgrade modulus. This seems to capture the effects I would expect. For what I recall, when I last had to do one of these I enveloped the design with FEA as described above and additionally looking at the wing walls as a heel-less retaining walls similar to how BridgeEI described it.

If you're doing this as precast then you have even more weirdness as you'll likely have a shiplap joint in the apron which you could argue will transfer shear across the joint for one apron/wing wall but will not transfer shear for the other side.

Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: Design of Huge RCB End Section

(OP)
Thanks Bridge EI. I was always curious how the ODOT standards were designed with respect to the apron acting as a footing. I take it you work in Oklahoma as well. I wish OK had a simple bridge manual that contained design assumptions, guidelines and policies like this.

RE: Design of Huge RCB End Section

Yea I work in Oklahoma. I doubt they ever get a manual, it's just one of those things you figure out when you've been around the block like I have...

I like TehMightyEngineers's approach and have been wanting to do it so I can reduce a lot of reinf steel in those things. I'm just not fully proficient in being able to do the FEA. I've also spent the time and have a library that has reinforcing and concrete details for walls up to 20+ feet. I got extremely tired of designing and detailing them so now my techs know to go find the library.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook: Model-Based Definition (MBD)
As product development becomes increasingly complex and dynamic, it’s necessary for traditional engineering practices, processes, tools and mindsets to adapt and take advantage of new possibilities. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close