×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

(OP)
ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections, says, "If the side of a roof projection is less than 15 ft. (4.6 m) long, a drift load is not required to be applied on that side."

See attached... https://res.cloudinary.com/engineering-com/image/upload/v1480959017/tips/ASCE_7-05_7.8_Roof_Projections_wfubpp.pdf

I have a 450' x 330' roof with (30) Roof Top Units (RTU's) that are each 7'-4" x 14'-3" in plan dimension; 5'-0" high. The plan dimensions create a 16'-0" diagonal dimension, which, when viewed from a direction normal to the diagonal, would, thus, prompt the greater than 15'-0" requirement.

These RTU's are evenly and uniformly spaced 50', 75' or 100' o/c.

My typical practice would be to employ the conservative, safe route of applying the drift loads to each of these RTU's, even though each "side" is less than 15'-0". HOWEVER, I do NOT want to over-design and unnecessarily raise the cost. YET... Safety!

1. Would any of you consider the 15'-0" diagonal a justifiable "side"?

2. Is there a(n unpublished) concern for the multiple units which might induce the slightest turbulence or tunneling effects as implied by ASCE 7-05, 6.5.15.1 Rooftop Equipment, thereby justifying the snow drift application?

3. Would any of you ignore the drifts around the RTU's altogether?

Suggestions?

Thank you!



RE: ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

I haven't been considering the diagonal but, frankly, that's just because I haven't been sharp enough to think of it. I feel that the aerodynamics of wind at the diagonal would reduce deposit some but I can supply no quantitative basis for that.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

The text of the ASCE 7 code refers to the "side" of the projection.

I don't think taking the diagonal is what was intended here.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

(OP)
Koot & JAE...

Thank you for your replies.

What about Question 2?

2. Is there a(n unpublished) concern for the multiple units which might induce the slightest turbulence or tunneling effects as implied by ASCE 7-05, 6.5.15.1 Rooftop Equipment, thereby justifying the snow drift application?

Thanks again!

RE: ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

Spaced very tightly, I'd be concerned that multiple units might start to present like larger single units aerodynamically. Your spacing is nowhere near that close in my opinion however. Heck, some tunnelling might actually reduce drift. It is, after all, the slow moving air that deposits the snow, just like silt in a river.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ASCE 7-05, 7.8 Roof Projections

You might read through the ASCE 7 commentary on this "roof projection" section - they talk a bit about closely spaced solar panels but it doesn't really directly respond to your question on your RTU's

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources