INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

(OP)
HELLO
i need to know alternate/equivalent ANCHOR NUT part number B0204083-4K in 'MS OR NAS OR BACN'.
thanks a lot.

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

houas...

Other than a very unfamiliar vendor part number, do You have anything that functionally and physically describes this part?

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

That is a Bombardier spec for a reduced rivet spacing floating anchor nut. I believe that an alternative anchor nut would be the NAS1789C4M.

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

This is a Bombardier specification.
Typically, these spec's are simple commercial item descriptions, when you read the actual document, and the last pages of these documents lists the approved suppliers of such parts.
I don't have access to BA's website login right now, but for your own convenience, Houas, you could contact Bombardier directly and ask their customer support yourself.
If you want a guess: it's a Monadnock part or something similar. There probably isn't a MS/NAS equivalent.

STF

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

The only way to confirm there is an acceptable "MS", "NAS", or "BACN" substitute for this OEM part would be to check the OEM's procurement specification. It is normally a good idea to use the specific replacement hardware specified by the OEM, rather than using substitute parts that are "similar".

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

Jamflip, SparWeb, Tbuelna: does it bug You when a brand-new guy starts a thread, asks a question... then never has any follow-up acknowledgement on the thread, such as 'thanks', etc???

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

Yes,
But life goes on.
Last visit to Eng-Tips by the OP was 11 December, so we can hope that the first few replies were read and understood.
STF

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

WKTaylor-

I follow a couple forums that you post on. And for what it's worth, I appreciate your detailed replies. In fact, your posts are usually so full of information that I learn something every time I read one.

Regards,
Terry

RE: SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K

(OP)
firstly thanks a lot for all a specially for Jamflip.
secondly a message for WKTaylor : I am new in the domain but I think that it is not the end of the world if you can help somebody who looks for an information, which ignores it.
Moreover any information which you know if thanks to the exchanges of the knowledge that you are enough lucky have the opportunity to know it.
Big one thanks for the scientists has fault the centuries which shared them knowledges for well of humanity
Regards.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close