How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
(OP)
Now i have read the related post but it's still unclear to me. My question is simple..
Can I use 1-10 independently in place of UG-37? The reason for me asking this is..
When I read UG-36, it says that when a certain opening diameter limit is exceeded, then you go for the rules of 1-7 in addition to UG-37.
Alternatively you can use 1-10.
Can I use 1-10 independently in place of UG-37? The reason for me asking this is..
When I read UG-36, it says that when a certain opening diameter limit is exceeded, then you go for the rules of 1-7 in addition to UG-37.
Alternatively you can use 1-10.





RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
prex
http://www.xcalcs.com : Online engineering calculations
http://www.megamag.it : Magnetic brakes and launchers for fun rides
http://www.levitans.com : Air bearing pads
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
EDIT: After some more digging I found out that 1-10 rule does its own area availability calculations and checks for the pressure sufficiency at that area ( I still need to confirm the pressure sufficiency part myself), so there is no such provision in 1-10 rule to calculate the area required unlike UG-37. So when you click on 1-10 as your design rule instead of UG-37 in PV ELite,it takes the formula of UG-37(d) that is for the external calculations, and for internal calculations it calculates the area availableand checks that area for the internal pressure sufficiency.
The reason i think UG-37(d) for external pressure is taken when you choose 1-10 as your design option in the software is that 1-10 does not address external pressure calculations.
I hope am right on this one. Please correct me if i am wrong. I guess they could have used appendix 1-8 for the external calcs in place of UG-37(d) in pv elite.
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
One thing to be careful of is jurisdiction and customer requirements. I know that Alberta for example has special considerations for Appendix 1-9 and 1-10 designs. If used, the vessel falls into a special category of registration. Customer specs also sometimes limit the use of these appendices. Just make sure you look at all of the codes/specs.
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
Regards,
Mike
The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?
Also please try and reply to the above post
RE: How authentic is 1-10 in lieu of UG-37?