In Service leak test after repair
In Service leak test after repair
(OP)
Hello All;
We had an average size of repair completed on an internal attachment to shell of a pressure vessel. The defect area was ground smoothly and filled with proper weld procedure.
Subsequently, the area was examined by 100% MPI. No defects were found. Hydro test was not done due to process contamination and other reasons. I understand that In-service inspection can be done instead of Hydro.
Can anyone tell me where I can find information regards to how to conduct the in-service inspection?
Thanks in advance.
We had an average size of repair completed on an internal attachment to shell of a pressure vessel. The defect area was ground smoothly and filled with proper weld procedure.
Subsequently, the area was examined by 100% MPI. No defects were found. Hydro test was not done due to process contamination and other reasons. I understand that In-service inspection can be done instead of Hydro.
Can anyone tell me where I can find information regards to how to conduct the in-service inspection?
Thanks in advance.





RE: In Service leak test after repair
In your case, one good - and that's probably more "mandatory" - source will be ABSA http://www.absa.ca/.
But take a look at ASME PCC-2 Article 5.1 and particularly Fig. 1. Also take a look at NB-23, aka the NBIC or National Board Inspection Code or perhaps API-510.
RE: In Service leak test after repair
RE: In Service leak test after repair
Please look at NBIC-23, Part-3, Sec-4, Clause,4.4.1.
All weld repair are to be subjected to liquid pressure test.
In service leak test is allowed only, when this test is accepted by Original Code of Constriction.The extract from NBIC-23 is below:-
"When an initial service leak test is permitted by the original code of construction, such testing may also be used to verify the leak tightness integrity of repairs".
Thanks.
Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist
Ontario,Canada.
ca.linkedin.com/pub/pradip-goswami/5/985/299
RE: In Service leak test after repair
See PCC-2 Article 2.11
5.1.1 Nondestructive Examination Before Welding.
Consideration should be given to the need for nondestructive
examination of surfaces to be welded.............
Regards
r6155
RE: In Service leak test after repair
The original post mentioned an in-service inspection using NDT, and not a leak test. In lieu of a pressure test, which can be any pressure up to a code hydrostatic test, NDT is permitted by Part 3 of the NBIC under repairs and as I said, is routinely performed.
RE: In Service leak test after repair
There is a big difference between "NDE must have done" and "Consideration should be given"
Regards,
Shane
RE: In Service leak test after repair
I know the difference, but in this case PCC-2 Article 2.11 5.1.1 appear not to be considered.
“Good engineering practice” always must be applied.
Regards
r6155
RE: In Service leak test after repair
We did 100% MPI after the repair. Is this good enough?
RE: In Service leak test after repair
Yes, as I said, refer to the Part 3 of the NBIC. Post repair NDT, like MT, is permitted and used in lieu of post repair pressure testing. Seek concurrence from the Inspector.
RE: In Service leak test after repair
Integrity of pressure vessel is 100% volumetric examination by Acoustic Emission (AE) testing.
Regards
r6155
RE: In Service leak test after repair
In-service inspection, in-service leak test are comparing apples to oranges. First, an in-service leak test does nothing to establish the integrity of a pressure vessel. It only means you don't have any gross leaks at the time the test was conducted.
You need to understand what in-service damage mechanisms exist and implement a fitness for service evaluation under API 579.