×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wood Truss

Wood Truss

Wood Truss

(OP)
Got a job where they want a vaulted ceiling with no ridge beam. I designed 2x8 rafters with V- shaped plywood gussets. The span is only about 8.5 ft. The builder got a quote from a truss company and they are proposing what is attached.
Basically, using the nail plate to act as a moment connection at the peak. Seems a bit sketchy to me.
What do you think?

RE: Wood Truss

So I'm not Koot, but I have worked at a place that manufactured trusses. Seems to me that with such a short span, if the plates are installed properly into that super-dense wood (read, lots of passes with the press) then I'd think it would be ok. Besides, it would be MiTek's stamp on the line, and those folks tend to know what they're doing with their truss plates.

Please remember: we're not all guys!

RE: Wood Truss

I'll jump in too:

I noticed a 10 psf Bottom chord dead load mentioned that is not actually there since this is just a 2X8 instead of an actual residential open web truss...

I also noticed a horizontal force of 18# due to uplift, but no horizontal kick due to any snow or dead load - that seems really questionable.

I assume the 30 psf snow is for the site and is not their minimum design snow load for all trusses?

I, too, am a little leary regarding the ridge connector. Personally, I would like to see calculations verifying the connection.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Wood Truss

The EOR is always responsible for delegated work not just MiTek. I have had a number of issues with Mitek in the past on truss designs they provided. Loading on the MT20 plates only shows tension and compression.

Not that it matters much but I have never seen a vaulted roof using a plate, a beam or scissor truss.

RE: Wood Truss

Looks like an arch. Better make sure you either account for lateral kickout forces at the top of your bearing wall or detail to not allow these forces to develop. And make sure that you are on the same page with the truss mfr on lateral deflections/forces at bearing wall.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)

Quote (SEJohn)

Looks like an arch. Better make sure you either account for lateral kickout forces at the top of your bearing wall or detail to not allow these forces to develop. And make sure that you are on the same page with the truss mfr on lateral deflections/forces at bearing wall.

They are not showing any lateral thrust. That was my first inclination as well.

RE: Wood Truss

Another thought..

These press plates are designed, as far as I know, to take either all tension or all compression loads across the entire plate, with the forces normal to the press plate embedded shear tabs.

I have never seen these tabs used to transfer tension/compression top, and compression/tension bottom within the same press plate.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Wood Truss

There is a note which states that "Rigid ceiling directly applied". I think you need advise that the ceiling is vaulted. I agree with the others, I would count on a truss plate forming a moment connection in timber.

Why no ridge beam? It will be hidden by the ceiling. If not you will need to design the wall for the thrust.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
No ridge beam because the span would be 30 ft. and they want it to be hidden.

RE: Wood Truss

OK.

Use a W12 ridge beam and upset it. Can detail that to get a good ridge vent situation too using the 2X8 rafters.

After all, all they are worried about is the look on the interior, right?

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
It is for an exterior corridor so venting is not a problem. They want 2x8 rafters so an i-beam to fit is not possible with the clean interior peak

RE: Wood Truss

Oh sure, I take one day off to write the PE and I miss out on my own personal summons. I'll mostly be reiterating other statements but here we go:

- I've never once seen this proposed in a real structural application. Back in my day, there wasn't a TPI method, nor a software option, for designing plated moment connections. Perhaps that has changed.

- All of the software packages that I used in the nineties had magic key combinations that you could use to hide the error messages in a bogus design. This may be that.

- In the plant, we used to make all kinds of pseudo structural stuff that involved non-designed, plated moment connections. It seemed to work quite well. One example in particular was a shelf system for plate storage that had 2x cantilevered out from such a joint.

- Used like this, the creep associated with each plate tooth will contribute to deflection in a manner much more severe than you'd get with a normal, axial only, truss connection. I'd like to know that was considered in the design. That said, my gut feel us that this would actually out perform your gusset plate solution with respect to stiffness. We never really saw any sag in those shelves that I mentioned.

- Rationally, one could simply count on only the lower third of the plate as a stand alone, tension only connector and prosecute the design on that basis using accepted TPI design principles. I doubt tthat the fabricator did that but Mitek could. The plate probably buckles at the top by the numbers anyhow. And, the rafters being as shallow as they are, the tension connection would be mostly parallel to grain anyhow which is helpful.

- Obviously, none of us wants to discourage innovation and economy. Because this is an unconventional application, I would ask for detailed calculation output on the joint and truss and ask that the design be revised and stamped by a Mitek rep. Mitek for two reasons. Firstly, like SLTA mentioned, they know their stuff. Secondly, they're a lot more liability cocious than the fabricators. 50/50 odds they veto it I bet.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
I thought about the couple analogy with the lower portion of the plate acting in tension and the upper portion of the wood bearing taking the compression. My concern was also plate teeth creep in addition to wood shrinkage. This geometry is not friendly to either. I have to disagree that this is stiffer than a 3/4" plywood gusset on each face - my intuition tells me otherwise. I am going to take your suggestion and get one of the mitek folks to sign off on it. Even so, I will have disclaimers on my drawings and show my detail as a better alternative :>

Thanks for everyone's help.

RE: Wood Truss

One could perhaps devise a more convincing version without compromising the intent. At the scale we're talking about, I'd happily stamp the detail below with 18 ga plate stock.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

I agree. I'd also add a small strap over the top too.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Wood Truss

Original detail seems to have a lot of extra material not located where the maximum forces are...just an opinion from the woods...

RE: Wood Truss

There is one aspect of the gusset detail that I'm curious about. The reenteant corner at the tension side of the peak will cause a notch like stress concentration that would be the death of 2x material etc. Are tension side stress concentrations not an issue with plywood? I could see how the laminate/particulate nature of plywood might improve that aspect of behaviour but I've never seen anything in print to that effect. Not that I've looked especially hard.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)



Quote (IFRs)

Original detail seems to have a lot of extra material not located where the maximum forces are...just an opinion from the woods...

Your a frickin Petroleum Engineer, why should I listen to you bigsmile Thanks for the input. I honestly did not spend much time optimizing the detail as the fee was really low on this one.

Quote (KootK)

There is one aspect of the gusset detail that I'm curious about. The reenteant corner at the tension side of the peak will cause a notch like stress concentration that would be the death of 2x material etc.

My gut feel was that the laminated nature would negate the notch issue in a low stress application like this one anyway.

Here is an easier idea that i should be able to make work...

RE: Wood Truss

If you've already got it designed and detailed, I'd stick with what you've got. It's a good detail and I assume that you went 4' to use strips out of a common sheet. The sketch below shows an alternate option for both kinds of plate.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
Yup, using a 4' sheet. I like yours.

RE: Wood Truss

I like KooTk's latest version, but I'm just a dumb Pet Eng so, never mind...
'

RE: Wood Truss

lol.... Look, the petroleum engineer's upset!

>>There was an inappropriate joke here, which I have deleted shortly after posting<<

All in good fun IFR; Besides, you could be one of the "real" petroleum engineers who size pipes and the supporting brackets, rather than one of the process or chemical ones (those ones are more MBA than Engineer)... *smiles evilly and looks around for Snorgy*

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)

Quote (Kootk)

If you've already got it designed and detailed, I'd stick with what you've got. It's a good detail and I assume that you went 4' to use strips out of a common sheet. The sketch below shows an alternate option for both kinds of plate.

I guess we could even simplify your idea and just lap the suckers. Would change the dynamics of the fasteners however. My moment is only 360 ft-lbs (ASD) so it could be made to work. Might want to add some Elmers on top of that :>

RE: Wood Truss

I'd considered that too XR250. I was concerned that you builder might object to the plywood joints being offset across the peak. Although, it's not as though the ply is continuous across the peak anyhow.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

I yam what I yam.
It's so nice to even be in this conversation with y'all.
If you overlap the rafters at the peak and put a single bolt through it I would call it a pinned connection. Does this simplify the analysis or create more problems?

RE: Wood Truss

Well, it would certainly simplify the analysis.... But then you would need positive lateral restraint at both the lower supports, and most walls are rather bad at providing that support.

Basically it would open up and go flat with all but the most careful detailing and, in my opinion, much stronger and stiffer walls than wood typically allows.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)

Quote (IFRs)

If you overlap the rafters at the peak and put a single bolt through it I would call it a pinned connection. Does this simplify the analysis or create more problems?

Damn Pet Engineers always thinking in bolts! bigsmile

I was think a group of nails. I have not laid this out, but If you consider a nail circle of say 4 1/2" using 9 nails and 360 ft-lb moment, you end up with a shear of 107 lbs per nail. So theoretically possible, but I would prefer a different solution that would mot be as sensitive to installation errors.

RE: Wood Truss

I noticed that IFRs bolted from this conversation...

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Wood Truss

Mike: You truly are one with the daddy jokes...

RE: Wood Truss

Stepping out of the box sometimes gives a new perspective, when I see a conversation about something that "might" work with "what about this" and "what about that" I like to go back to 30,000 feet and get a broad look at it. Yes, horizontal thrust is an issue but as I see it, wood is not particularly rigid or stiff and any small deflection in the peak will put huge forces on the top of the walls. Of course, they will give a little and everything gets redistributed. But, if the wall connections are rigid or the horizontal thrust (which was mentioned bu SEJohn and MSquared above) is handled elsewhere then struggling with a ridge detail that does not need to be fixed or rigid might be handled with a pinned connection.

Too much oil in the old (head) gears I guess. I apologize for wasting y'all's time.

RE: Wood Truss

@XR: While looking as something else, low and behold, I stumbled across TPI standard provisions for plates with moment. I figured that you'd be interested, at least in passing. If you're interested in knowing more about this highly intuitive equation, lemme know.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
KootK,

I would like to see the derivation of this equation. Please provide ASAP. :>

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources