×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Step 242 files

Step 242 files

Step 242 files

(OP)
I hope I am in the correct area. I did a few stp242 searches and found no results.

For generic 3D CAD file outputs, step 203 and 214 are now part of step 242. Does anyone know what advantages were made (if any) on the CNC machining side?

As a simple example say a 3D CAD feature is 40mm +3/-0. This tolerance is annotated in 3D or created with SolidWorks MBD (model based definition)package. Will the CNC machine aim for the nominal 40mm from CAD? Meaning a failed part if just undersized. A human machinist might not go for the "perfect" 40mm.

Does step242 slow the tool path based on tight tolerances in 3D? Any machine change for surface finish? With GD&T does it know anything about tolerance, MMC, MMB etc. If the designer drives a tolerance to zero and uses only "bonus tolerance" (I know some hate that term, so shift)does the CNC follow those criteria?

***BASICLY, is there any smart intelligence between the CAD output STP242 and a CNC machine?***

Thanks for your time, Troy

RE: Step 242 files

Are you possibly confusing STP242 with STEP-NC?


STP242 is more of a combination of 203/214 with the ability to universally transfer PMI information regarding the geometric properties, tolerances, finishes, and other requirements within the model itself.

You still have to program your machines based upon the model information. Additionally, post processors are very machine-specific as you get to more advanced features, and varying controller manufacturers. It would be very difficult to create a universal machine language model.

There's also no 'right answer' for how your cutting strategy goes. It's based upon the machine, the cutting tool, the material, and many other variables. There is no "below a tolerance of +/- .xxx feed 20% slower" to just make an 'easy button' for making parts.

RE: Step 242 files

Troy442,

When sending out computerized information, always select the lowest common denominator. You do not know what the other guy can read. I am actually not all that familiar with the STEP standard. I assume that STEP 203 is the format most likely to work at the other end, and that is what I send.

For communication purposes, bleeding edge technology usually does not work.

--
JHG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources