INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Story Discussion: Conventional or biological water treatment?

Story Discussion: Conventional or biological water treatment?

(OP)
ENGINEERING.com Joan Thompson's article on water treatment approaches has been published at:

Conventional Water Treatment Can Be a Disaster for Small Communities
http://www.engineering.com/DesignerEdge/water/Arti...

Quote:

With an enormous expanse of lakes and rivers, it’s hard to believe that Canada would have any major issues supplying clean water to its residents—but unfortunately, this is the case.
For decades, First Nations communities in Canada have consistently dealt with mismatched water treatment systems, and the consequences have been disastrous....

Engineers, we want to hear from you:

- Small utilities are assigned conventional treatment technologies (eg. coagulation and flocculation, manganese greensand), without a proper assessment of their source water. Are there any civil engineers with similar frustrations? What other challenges arise when choosing the right treatment approach?

- Surveys show that regulatory officials and utility workers are hesitant to implement biological treatment technologies since it is an alternative treatment approach that is relatively new. Has anyone ever encountered specific challenges with biological water treatment that they think should be addressed? What problems arise with implementing them in small communities?

RE: Story Discussion: Conventional or biological water treatment?

A lot of the treatment methods that are selected to be used in small remote towns or villages are selected by engineering companies who don't have the depth of experience that is required. I call them package plant engineers. They think they know water treatment but they do not

In small remote towns or villages they do not have the expertise to run plants or to maintain them. There is too much electronics. In the old days we did not electronics just wire, pulleys and floats. In remote communities we should go back to their use. Everyone understands wire, pulleys and floats. It is also unrealistic to expect finished water quality to be as good as what is expected in a city. That type of quality costs money. Certain standards should relaxed.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close