×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

(OP)
For a variable speed pumping application, what are the main advantages of variable frequency drive (VFD) over liquid rheostat controls?  Are there any advantages of liquid rheostats over VFDs?

Any help would be much appreciated.  Thanks.

RE: VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

I'm not sure, but I think you are talking about a wound-rotor motor with the rotor slip rings connected to conductors in a saline-water tank. The conductors are lowered into the tank to decrease the secondary resistance and speed up the motor. If this is true, the main difference (besides the fact that the tank method is REALLY obsolete) is that the VFD, with the proper motor, can run at practically any speed (typically down to 50% of rating) for any length of time, can be programmed to run based on the load, the current, or other parameters. VFDs are also much smaller and more dependable. Don't you have to keep adjusting the water and the position of the conductors in the tank? There are several other options for a wound-rotor motor which are newer than the tank and which do not require a VFD, the 'static-stepless' control among them.

RE: VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

The advantage of the liquid reostat -- unmatched by any
other technology -- is that it can't fail instantaneously
so with regular maintenance it is very reliable.
On the other hand it constantly looses water, so maintenance
is a must.

<nbucska@pcperipherals.com>

RE: VFD vs Liquid Rheostat Controls

The only advantage of the liquid rheostat is that you probably already have one.  

The VFD will be much more efficient and provide better speed/level control.  It should be more reliable as well.  

The existing wound rotor motor can be used with a VFD by shorting out the rotor windings.  But you might be better off with a new squirrel-cage motor since the efficiency would probably be better and you can get an inverter-duty motor that will hold up better.  

Not many new liquid rheostat systems being installed these days.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources