×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

rooftop mechanical platform supporting units on isolators

rooftop mechanical platform supporting units on isolators

rooftop mechanical platform supporting units on isolators

(OP)
i'm designing an HSS platform on a concrete roof. the platform supports two AC units, and the platform consists of beams which span to short HSS posts. the columns are anchored to the concrete roof slab, over concrete columns (the slab and beams cannot support the AC/platform dead loads). the platform also has grating to support maintenance workers. platforms about 2' high.

i'm designing the anchorage of the units to the platform with Fp determined from asce 7-10 chapter 13, with internally isolated components (Fp = 2.44 * W). also checking the platform beams for these loads.

question:
when anchoring the platform itself to the concrete roof... should i still use the 2.44 * W? seems overkill, although that's what the load path would come down to... also, i'd have to use omega on the anchorage to the roof, which will kill the design. i'm pretty sure this is the case, but would love to hear thoughts on this.

thanks y'all.

RE: rooftop mechanical platform supporting units on isolators

For heavy platforms, I have used ap = 1 and Rp = 2.5 for the platform self weight and ap = 2.5 and Rp =2 for the equipment weight. It helps a little. I can't think of any good justification for using ap=1 and Rp=2.5 for all of the weight when designing the anchorage.

I have not found a good reference for internally isolated equipment. Often times, the internally isolated elements are a small portion of the overall weight. It seems reasonable to use the higher seismic force for the weight of the internally isolated elements and a lower force for the balance of the weight. For instance, an Air Handling Unit (AHU) may only have isolators on the fans while the coils, filters, frame, enclosure, etcetera are not isolated. But, I have not found anything published that supports this reasoning.

RE: rooftop mechanical platform supporting units on isolators

Presuming your platform is rather large, 2' of clearance under the platform is insufficient for roofing and maintenance of the roof system. Further, depending on which code you are under, the clearance you note might be a code violation.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources