×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities
2

Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

(OP)
Hi,

I am currently modeling a curved canopy. The RISA model is attached. The member named "Curved Beam" is giving me high D/C ratios. at the tail end of the canopy (0.81 for envelope). The suggested design members seem unrealistically large. On the detail report I am seeing that equation H1-1b is controlling for the code check. However, when I do this code check with my enveloped Mz, My and A, I get that it should actually be closer to 0.17. Can someone let me know if there is anything wrong which I am doing in the model? Also, of note, I set my unbraced lengths to 0 at the top and bottom of the beams.

Thanks

RE: Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

your model isn't attached,

however did you also set your unbraced length for axial to zero (or near zero) if you're trusting both your top and bottom flanges to be fully laterally supported.

RE: Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

I don't have an answer on the code check anomaly, perhaps JoshPlum will come in and comment on that regard.

As for the overall analysis, were you intending on doubling up your wind loads? LC 5 and 6 both account for Wind A and B. That means on the back half of your canopy you're pushing 160 PSF downward wind force at service levels. Seems extreme. Due to this, you're getting deflections under factored loading in excess of 5" (@ N342 and N348) which could be some of the cause of the code check issues.

Just my 2 cents.

RE: Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

It's the torsional warping stresses that are causing those higher code checks. Take a look at the Member Torsion results spreadsheet for member M392. You will see warping stresses on the order of 44 ksi. These are analogous to weak axis bending stresses. Therefore, RISA includes them in the weak axis portion of the code check.

Now, if you do not believe these warping stresses are real (or want to account for it in a different way) you can turn off this effect by going to the solution tab of the (Global) model settings and unchecking the checkbox that says Torsional Warping. This affects the stiffness of the model as well as the stress calculations.

Warping is a tough concept and RISA accounts for it in an imperfect way. Better than most structural programs, but certainly not perfect. So, if torsion because an important part of your project, it is always a good idea to take a closer look at those forces / stresses and make sure you agree with them. In your case, I wonder if your connections are really going to be detailed out in a way which will impart torsion into those beams.

RE: Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

I think that confirms my thoughts about the 5" of deflection at the outer corners.

RE: Curved Canopy - Beam Capacities

(OP)
Thanks for the help JoshPlum and jayrod12!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources