×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Heatsink Flatness Specification

Heatsink Flatness Specification

Heatsink Flatness Specification

(OP)
Hello All,

I'm hoping for some input on flatness specifications for extruded heatsinks (typically with a machined mounting surface) for electronics applications. Module vendors will recommended flatness over a length of 100µm (e.g., http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-AN2010_06_Mo... ) or per inch (e.g., http://www.pwrx.com/pwrx/app/mount%20pwr%20modu.pd...). The heatsink vendors will tend to have either a total flatness spec for the whole extrusion face or on limited basis (e.g., table B of http://www.aavid.com/product-group/extrusions-na/d...). My impression is that modern drawings using GD&T methods call out flatness for the total surface (e.g., http://www.gdandtbasics.com/flatness/).

My question: is there a straightforward way to equate these callout methods or to scale the flatness for differing dimensions? I'm a little confused on how to consider this when accounting for tolerance build-up, and this doesn't seem like a straightforward unit conversion exercise. If a surface met the 0.001 in/in requirement, it would seem to easily meet 0.002 in/2 in. More concretely- What would 0.001 in/in equate to in µm/100µm? What's the total flatness of a 6" by 12" plate with flatness of 0.001 in/in? Maybe I'm overthinking this?

Many thanks!
-Jack

RE: Heatsink Flatness Specification

It is permissible to specify total flatness, per unit flatness or both. Converting between imperial and metric dimensions is simple unit conversion like any other dimension. Note that the denominator of a flatness per unit specification must be an area (i.e. square or circle), not a straight line. Thus 0.001 in/in is incorrect, that would be a straightness specification. It should be 0.001 inch per 1x1 inch.

It is somewhat difficult to compare a total flatness and unit flatness, you have to work out the worst case surface allowed by the per unit tolerance. It will be more than just the flatness per unit multiplied by the size. Hopefully someone can dig up an example, I don't have one handy.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

RE: Heatsink Flatness Specification

Y14.5-2009
Section 5.4.2.2

RE: Heatsink Flatness Specification

This may be of use: http://www.alexandriaindustries.com/technicalguide...

It appears to be part of the Aluminum Extruders Council publication available at http://www.aec.org/?page=lib_designmanualjump

This article is also interesting - different style of heatsink, but interesting http://www.aec.org/?page=lib_almagledheatsink

You may also come across ANSI H35.2, bur I think it does not apply to custom aluminum shapes; instead to industrial standards.

RE: Heatsink Flatness Specification

Flatness per unit length is setting the curvature of the surface if it accumulates in a constant fashion. Go far enough and a uniform deviation will produce a complete circle.

I think the result is not linear - that a delta/length for a give length <> 2delta/2length.

The proof is that one can take a circle and divide it into 4 equal arcs. Pick one vertex as an origin and then draw a line from the origin to each of the other vertices. Use that as the baseline and measure the deviation to the circle. The first is a small amount; the second delta will be the radius of the circle; and the third is almost the diameter of the circle.

It is likely the effect is less pronounced on smaller amounts of the arc, but I would not be surprised to see that it is noticeable.

RE: Heatsink Flatness Specification

(OP)
I just wanted to thank everyone for the replies to date- all useful perspectives. I'm currently working on getting a draft of Y14.5-2009 to see what that turns up.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources