×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

(OP)
Good Day!

I am designing retaining walls to be used on a railway project. AASHTO LRFD is required for the design.
Which parts of the code should I read & apply to my design?

For the retaining wall, I have already considered active soil pressure, seismic soil pressure using mononobe-okabe method, (passive to be neglected), surcharge(vertical & horizontal), cohesion, wind (have to confirm if needed).

For the 1st type, the train runs on the heel side of the wall and the soil to be retained is on the other side. How do I apply the load from the train? Do I just apply as uniform surcharge or concentrated load? Dead or live?

For the 2nd type, the soil and the train tracks are both on the heel side.

RE: Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

If it was per AREMA I believe they had soil surcharge pressures for train loadings given in the code. For AASHTO you probably have to calculate the actual pressure based on a strip load per 3.11.6.2 in AASHTO. Don't forget the AASHTO eccentricity check for retaining walls and AASHTO also requires you to calculate both strength level and service level soil bearing pressures.

Professional and Structural Engineer (ME, NH, MA)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

The attached graph may be of help. It shows surcharge loading due to Coopers E80 loading; keep in mind this is for one track only. If you have multiple tracks you have to account for the additional surcharge. Also, some railroads have specific requirements for the surcharge.

One question: In your Type 1, did you mean to write that the train runs over the toe instead of heel because the retained fill on a wall is over the heel?

RE: Retaining LRFD Design Considerations

(OP)
Thank you very much!

Yes. It has no heel but has a toe. Imagine a rectangular tunnel without the top part. There's 2 retaining walls whose toes are connected, & the trains run through them. On the other side is 2+ metres of soil. I figured that the only use of the train loading and everything inside the wall would be for bearing capacity check and footing design. The active, seismic, dead & live surcharge would be used for stem design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources