INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Effective length factor for torsional buckling (kz) for column

Effective length factor for torsional buckling (kz) for column

(OP)
sorry to ask this is kind of basic question but im still confused about how to determine the kz (Effective length factor for torsional buckling) because i cant find the value anywhere. is it the larger value of Kx dan Ky determine by using alignment chart? or it depends on the end restrains of the column? or we just take it as 1?

RE: Effective length factor for torsional buckling (kz) for column

Not to worry. I've doing this forever and I still find that stuff a bit confusing at times. Kz represents a purely twisting mode of buckling. It almost never governs for HSS or WF. More of an issue with WT and Cruciform which have very low torsional stiffnesses. Kz x L will represent the distance between points of rotational restraint on the column. Ninety five times out of a hundred that does mean Kz = 1.0.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Effective length factor for torsional buckling (kz) for column

(OP)
@KootK thank you! does it apply the same when designing an unbraced frame column and braced frame column

RE: Effective length factor for torsional buckling (kz) for column

It would be the same unless you've got some weird frame that resists sway through member torsion.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close