×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios
3

Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

(OP)
Hello,

I've been inspecting local fabrication shops and i've noticed that at each one they do not factor the stress ratio [Stress Value of the metal at test temperature / Stress Value of the metal at design temperature].

E.g.:
Contact Tower
MAWP: 1360 psi @ 195 deg F
Leak test was done at 1768 psi @ ~85 deg F (cant remember the exact temperature).
So, they simply multiplied the MAWP by 1.3. I do not have any books with me to find the stress values but I am sure that for that ambient temperature, the test pressure should be much higher. Note, it has 600# flanges.

I did mention it to my superiors and their response was that the MAWP is not "high enough" to consider the stress ratios. The same thing happened with piping.

What are your opinions?

RE: Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

3
I am going to assume that you are referring to pressure vessel fabricated according to ASME Section VIII, Division 1, post 1999 Editions.

The calculation in UG-99(b) states that the minimum hydrostatic test pressure, at the top of the vessel, must equal 1.3*MAWP* the lowest stress ratio (LSR) for the materials of which the vessel is constructed. The stress ratio is the allowable stress value at the test temperature - St, divided by the allowable stress value at the design temperature - S. Hence, St/S.

For typical carbon steel vessels (e.g. SA-516-70), S=St up until (and including) 500°F. So, in your example temperatures of 195°F DT and ambient of 85°F, St/S=1.

It's certainly not an issue of the MAWP being "high enough". That's just wrong.

RE: Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

If the fabricators do what you say all of the time (even when the design temp is above 500 Deg F when S<St) then they are wrong!!!!

RE: Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

eduardoeh
You are wrong with stress ratio
You are wrong with leak test. This is Hydrostatic test. Please see ASME V for leak test

Regards
r6155


RE: Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

(OP)
TGS4 thank you! It makes sense what my superiors meant to say. They meant that the allowable stress doesn't change up to and including 500 deg F. I wish I had the code book to view these tables and not to search the internet.
By the way, the material is SA-516-70 and Sec VIII Div 1.

RE: Leak Testing (hydro) w/o Considering Stress Ratios

You will find the tables for c/s in Section IIA. You need to look the common materials up ASAP. The shops all have Sect. II books, and the tables don't change [since 1999]. Just ask to look at an old one.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources