×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Post Tensioned Slab Beams

Post Tensioned Slab Beams

Post Tensioned Slab Beams

(OP)
I am looking for some input for the design of PT slab beams. When I say slab beams what I am referring to is relatively wide beam and shallow beams.

Are there any limitations to the width used? Should the design also consider T-Beam action?

My specific condition is a 72' span over a large open space with beams at about 30' c/c and I am considering a 8' wide x 4' deep slab beam. I know this approach is used for parking garages in some instances but I haven't had the opportunity to use this approach before. Any input is appreciated.

RE: Post Tensioned Slab Beams

Generally I stick to a limit of 2400mm, which is pretty much the same as 8'.

Your initial suggestion of 8' wide x 4' deep does not sound unreasonable for a 72' span.

You should definitely consider T-Beam action.

RE: Post Tensioned Slab Beams

Ron,

Yes it should consider T beam action, but using the limited flange width in ACI 318 for RC beams or even better the Eurocode effective flange width, not the full panel width as suggested by some in USA.

For width, I would normally limit it to about .25 - .3 of the transverse span length. But because your beam is so deep it is really a beam and not a band beam. The width/depth ratio does matter in this definition

RE: Post Tensioned Slab Beams

Quote (OP)

Are there any limitations to the width used?

1) Shear for beams very much wider than their supporting beams requires some special / two way consideration. That's not unique to PT systems however.

2) Will you also be prestressing the slab between beams? Probably. I think that's a good idea to maintain prepression in the beams.

3) Perhaps give some thought to the effects that axial shortening may have in any supporting structure that will offer restraint.

Other than that, the concept seems solid. Cool span.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources