×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

(OP)
Hi Everyone,

I have a few questions about flexible diaphragms and the hand calculations vs. modeling results (using SAP2000).

By hand calculation, a flexible diaphragm would equally distribute forces to lateral systems based solely on tributary width regardless of stiffness. I have built a model of a building that we are retrofitting. It has concrete shear walls on the exterior and we are adding internal steel bracing to try and break up the span of the diaphragm. I know that the shear walls are much much stiffer than the braces and would expect more load to go to the walls if the diaphragm is anything but fully flexible.

The existing diaphragm is a poured gypsum concrete. We are adding horizontal bracing at the roof level and assuming the gypsum fails. I guess I have 2 questions:

1.
I've reduced the f11 and f22 properties to 1% to make the poured gypsum (shell elements) as flexible as possible but still be there to distribute the vertical loads to steel framing. However, I am still not getting the tributary distribution of forces I would expect from a flexible diaphragm. Is the diaphragm still acting as semi-rigid?
2.
Is any type of diaphragm actually fully flexible in real life? Won't the diaphragm always act as a semi-rigid diaphragm, thus distributing forces according to stiffness?

Thank you for your help!

-Peter




RE: Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

To answer your 2nd question.... There is no such thing as a perfectly flexible or perfectly rigid diaphragm. Reality is always somewhere in between.

As long as you use shell elements to model your diaphragm it will be some form of semi-rigid. The more flexible the material the closer to idealized flexible you should get. The more rigid the material the closer to idealized rigid diaphragm behavior you should get.

RE: Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

(OP)
Thanks, Joshplum.

This is what I figured.

If I remove the roof shell elements and apply my vertical loads directly to the steel framing, would that be closer to a flexible diaphragm?

RE: Modeling Flexible Diaphragm

If you are adding in horizontal bracing in the plane of the roof just model that and ignore the rest of the diaphragm. you need to understand the forces in the braces anyway.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources