×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stiffness Modifier

Stiffness Modifier

Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
Dear Members,
I would like to have your feedback on the use of stiffness modifier. We generally use the value dictated by ACI committee as to model the cracked behavior, which are
Compression Member : Wall, Column, Pier = 0.7
Flexure Member : Beam, Spandrels = 0.35
Slab = 0.25

What if i want to use 0.5 for columns or 0.2 for beams. Are there any restrictions. I have played around with it on software like ETABS and noticed change in flow of forces as it transfer towards more stiff element. Your kind comments would be highly appreciated.

Thanks

RE: Stiffness Modifier

You can certainly do a parametric design where you alter the stiffnesses and use the worst-case results.

Using "more cracked" less stiffness in your overall frame increases your second order effects and usually results in a more conservative design.
But as you note, there could be conditions where you alter the stiffness of one element an actually underestimate the load that it receives...so be careful that you don't under design something by making it a wet noodle in your analysis.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
Dear JAE,
Thanks for your response. As you mentioned that i should be careful that I don't end up under-designing something. How about walls, mostly when I assigned opening I usually find small piers corner failing at the edges. What If want to alter its stifness so that It can transfer load to the other end. Possible ? Wall core is a stiff element and will reducing stiffness at one corner can result in safety issue ?

RE: Stiffness Modifier

ACI provides a general measure of member stiffness (beams, columns, walls) using the Chapter 9 equation for modified moment of inertia, Ie.
This is an attempt to measure, as close as practical, the stiffness as it is reduced under moment, and possibly helped under axial compression.

The approximations you list in your first post are general reductions found in frames which can be used to account for second order effects of drifting.

For walls, as you mention, at openings and irregularities, it probably isn't wise to just randomly change these values to get a design to "work".
Rather, I think you can adjust groups of members down, and up, to get a worst case scenario.

This means you don't adjust relative Ie values between members to get a particular design to work.
Instead, due to uncertainty in knowing what Ie may actually be, you would set Ie values at very low, and also at very high values and design each member for the worst case in that range.

I'm not sure if the above answers your specific question or not. If you provide more information on what you are doing perhaps we can further discuss.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Stiffness Modifier

JAE's got the measure of this. When you make stiffness alterations, do so because it makes sense structurally, not merely because you're trying to game the system to make things work that don't. If you can accomplish both purposes, then great. We do similar things with exterior columns all the time. But, in those instances, there is genuine logic to support the change in stiffnesses assumed rather than simply a desire for a different outcome.

Quote (rummaan17)

How about walls, mostly when I assigned opening I usually find small piers corner failing at the edges. What If want to alter its stifness so that It can transfer load to the other end.

This is actually a pretty common problem. What can be done about it rationally is a function of what the failure mode(s) is for the small pier. If it's primarily an axial load failure, then I would re-proportion the pier to make it work. If it's primarily a shear or bending failure, I'd consider allowing the small pier to redistribute it's bending to other, stiffer wall piers. Then, capacity design the pier for shear base on the axial load and the vertical reinforcing provided.

Another alternative is to use non-ACI recommendations for stiffness. Canada's concrete code, for example, presents flexural stiffness on a sliding scale based on what the axial demand is.

See pages 21 & 26 of this document for some related discussion. It doesn't answer your specific question but discusses similar issues in a highly rational manner.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
Dear Jae and Kootk,
Thanks alot to both of you for adding value to this post with your kind comments. Was really helpful.

JAE/KootK my case is that sometime I see walls piers Or spandrel failing in shear, when I am using modifier PIER=0.7 and Spandrel=0.35. Then I lower these value for PIEr to 0.35 Or spandrel to 0.25 which result in a safe design. Is this correct?

According to me I am using the value mentioned in the code. ACI TABLE 6.6.3.1.1.(b) dictates that the minimum value also that can be used

RE: Stiffness Modifier

Quote (rummaan17)

Then I lower these value for PIEr to 0.35 Or spandrel to 0.25 which result in a safe design. Is this correct?... ACI TABLE 6.6.3.1.1.(b) dictates that the minimum value also that can be used

My interpretation of the alternate table is different. I believe that, if you use the alternate table, you have to use the values in the "I" column based on the the axial load / reinforcement ratio etc. You only get to use the minimum value if those formulas predict stiffnesses equal to or less than the minimums. That said, historically, 0.25 has been a pretty common value to use for coupling beams.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
`

Quote (KootK)

If it's primarily a shear or bending failure, I'd consider allowing the small pier to redistribute it's bending to other, stiffer wall piers.

Can you please tell how your redistribute. Thanks in Advance.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

Quote (rumman17)

Can you please tell how your redistribute.

Take the shear that cannot be resisted without failing the pier in flexure and relocate it to some other pier(s) in a logical manner.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
Take the Shear without failing the pier ? can you explain a bit in detail, would be helpful.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

1) Figure out how much flexure the pier can take.
2) Capacity shear design the pier for the shear associated with the moment from #1.
3) Figure out the lateral shear associated with the moment from #1.
4) Take the shear demand on the pier, subtract the shear from #3, and assign that shear to other wall segments.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

(OP)
Thanks for help KootK.

RE: Stiffness Modifier

You're most welcome rummaan.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources