×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

(OP)
Hi all:

I'm a bit confused about the approach for flagpole foundation designs. I designed a pole foundation based on IBC's straightforward approach in Section 1807 (Unconstrained round piers subject to lateral load). It was relatively narrow and deep (~2.25' wide and ~7.5' deep.) The contractor then prepared on-site an excavation for a premade "kit" which is wider and shallower with flared ends, which subsequently failed inspection. This off-the-shelf solution fails the IBC equation badly at the given dimensions (and doing some research it looks like flagpole foundations are often this odd shallow, nearly square "plug".) Are any of you familiar with how these foundations are justified? Since the steel for the kit is currently in the ground, the contractor wants to keep the shallow depth and widen the foundation to our satisfaction. Doing this with the pole-foundation equation gives huge diameters, and the only other method I'm familiar with is treating it as a bottom-supported spread footing with an eccentric load. I'm not aware of any design approach that combines ground-support with lateral moment resistance.

A constructably-reasonable circular spread footing results in there being negative soil pressure at the heel. So the actual pressure distribution would be circular with a "chord" missing in plan view. I don't have the time to relearn the calculus needed to do derive that from scratch. Are any of you familiar with a design approach or approximation that would give the actual toe pressure under those conditions?

RE: Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

Personally, I'd approximate the round foundation as an equivalent square foundation, with the area of the square matching the area of the circle.
Negative pressure on the heel isn't a deal breaker for me - but obviously it's not possible. I'd use a different pressure distribution - triangular - instead of trapezoidal. You still have 2 unknowns - the pressure at the toe and the width over which the pressure acts. Pressure at the heel is zero.
I look to keep bearing pressure over ~2/3 the width of the footing.

Where I think your question gets a little trickier is flexural reinforcing of the footing - given that the wind can blow from any direction.

RE: Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

I agree--check the bearing pressure under a square footing with area and section modulus less than or equal to the area and section modulus of the round footing.

The bearing pressure due to an eccentric load is equal to (2*P)/(3*a*B), where a is the distance from the leading edge of the footing to the load, and B is the width of the footing.

DaveAtkins

RE: Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

Here's a pdf of a few pages from a textbook by Teng. I found in the geo forums here a few years ago. It was from a bi-axial bending on a footing post, but the pages also include a round footing with e outside of the kern - which sounds like your situation. Maybe if one of the geotechs stop by this, they can fill in more of the details on the reference. Hope this helps.

RE: Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

If you do integrate the expressions for force and moment on a circular slab, they're kind of a mess and still require iteration to find the point of uplift.
The simplest approach to that problem if you're starting from scratch:
Assume linear bearing distribution y=Ax+B.
Assume a point of loss of contact, from which you can find A/B by setting y = 0.
Use Simpson's rule in a spreadsheet to integrate bearing over the area and compare to total weight. That'll let you find A and B.
Use Simpson's rule to integrate bearing x moment arm over the area to find the resulting moment. Compare that to the actual moment. And adjust point of uplift and repeat until you hit the solution.

RE: Circular Footing with eccentric load and "negative" soil pressure (Flagpole)

This just occurred to me--if you have RISA-3D (or some other FEA software), you can model the round footing with soil springs below.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources