INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

(OP)
Dear all,

I have been trying to understand the exactly difference between this two damage mechanisms: sulfidation and wet H2S damage.

I was wondering; if sulfidation occurs mostly due to H2S and the main reaction is Fe+ + e- + HS- + H+ --> FeS + 2H
and this reaction is the same as the main reaction in wet H2S mechanism, why isn't a concern the atomic Hydrogen difussion in sulfidation conditions?

Thanks in advance.

RE: Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

2
You form atomic hydrogen from high temperature sulfidation (and can estimate corrosion rates with a hydrogen flux meter), but at the higher temperatures that sulfidation corrosion is a concern, the diffusion rate is great enough you don't charge the steel. Just diffuses right on through. Kind of doing a "bake out" at the same time...

Nathan Brink

RE: Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

Exactly, sulfidation is a high temperature reaction so it is not aqueous.
Sulfidation will occur under either oxidizing or reducing conditions and is worse when combined with Na, Cl, P and other fuel impurities.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

(OP)
In first place,thanks for your answers.
I understand that because of the temperature you wont have aqueous phase.

NBrink said that at those temperatures hydrogen difussion rate is great enough yo don't charge the Steel.
But assuming you have a poor quality Steel with discontinuities such as laminations or inclusions, won't be blistering a concern?

If you have wet H2S, the difussion rate would be a direct indicator of the probability of that damage occur. Or am I wrong?

RE: Wet H2S vs Sulfidation

The hydrogen would only be an issue if there were inclusions that it reacted with.
At high temp hydrogen won't collect, it diffuses too easily.
Now if the back side of the steel is cold that is different, because at some depth the H wants to stop moving freely.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close