×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

(OP)
I am working on a project where I am using HSS tube columns and a concentrically braced frame for shear resistance. The steel horizontal braces were originally going to be steel tubes that ONLY resisted lateral loads because the architect wanted an exposed wood truss and glu-lam support beam floor system. The glu-lam beams would pass along the face of the columns where it would be supported with a seated connection and the steel horizontal braces would tie into the face of the column as usual with a diagonal tube brace and gusset connection. The reason for this is that the building will have a lot of openings and for a modern/industrial look, the architect wanted to see the steel braced frames from the outside windows looking in. After digging into the design, I started wondering if the glu-lam beam could act as the horizontal brace and resist the gravity and lateral loads. It would greatly help the economy of the project if I did not have the redundancy of the steel beam if the glu-lam could be used. I looked through the code and it does not necessarily state this is acceptable one way or another - or at least from what I have read. It gives ductility requirements and that may be my answer, but just from a thought process - it seems that these large glu-lam beams would be able to resist the axial forces from the lateral loads. Have any of you ever had this situation or come across something similar? Any input would be helpful.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

If I understand your situation correctly, you'll be delivering shear to the face of your columns via the glulam beams and resisting that shear near the center of your columns via the vertical bracing. I expect that, baring some very special detailing, this condition would result in some terrible cross grain bending in your columns at the joint. And that, of course, is often a deal breaker in wood.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

steel columns Koot, only wood beams. I could see this working ut the connection of the beams to the columns will likely be the weak point.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

Ah... I see. What would have been cross grain bending will now be some significant torsion that may have to be dealt with in the columns and at the base plate. Or via weak axis bending in the glulam beams I suppose.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

Could there be a floor infill beam behind the column that would run right out to the column? Maybe hang the spandrel beams from that? I could see some improved detailing that way.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

- how many stories?

- tension only bracing?

- any weird detailing required for the thermal break?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

(OP)
There will not be any thermal breaks, but there will be some tricky detailing to connect the wood beam to the gusset plate for the applied force. The braces are being designed for tension and compression. The building is a three story building.

RE: Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Modification

Quote (Charred)

The braces are being designed for tension and compression. The building is a three story building.

This may present an interesting opportunity. With T&C braces, you don't actually need your horizontal spandrel beams to be part of the vertical truss that forms your bracing system. As such, each of those tricky connections would only need to transfer the shear delivered at that diaphragm level. That would reduce your peak connection force by about a factor of three. It might also be a better reflection of the expected force distribution since the connection eccentricity between the braced frame and spandrel beams will introduce additional flexibility.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources