×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

80' unbraced steel columns

80' unbraced steel columns

80' unbraced steel columns

(OP)
I am proposing on a single story industrial project that will have 80' tall unbraced steel columns. The roof structure will be metal deck supported by joists and joist girders on 50' bays. Top of roof will be approximately 80' above top of slab. No mezzanines.

I want to get a sense of what these columns will be before I send my fee. I know I'll likely need to deal with splices and fairly large sections.

The joist girders will sit on top of column cap plates. I don't worry about eccentricity when you have a joist girder bearing on top of the usual HSS8x8 or 10x10 column since it's a small section. In this case, I'm wondering if it's warranted to assume some amount of eccentricity (with unbalanced loading situations) since the column sections will probably be 14x14 or larger and they're just so darn tall. The joist girder will still be on top of the column but maybe assume a few inches of eccentricity? See attached sketch.

Any opinions on whether I should assume some eccentricity for unbalanced load situations or thoughts on tall columns would be appreciated.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Bloody cool. I see the argument but vote for no eccentricity. Even with smaller columns, I feel that the rotation of the joist and seat effectively put the reaction pretty close to the edges of the column. In summary, if concentric is good enough for little columns, I feel that it's good enough for big columns too.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Wouldn't moving the reaction closer to the edge of the column increase eccentricity? Based on your sketch, I think you should consider some eccentricity, but it probably won't make much difference. The moment due to eccentricity is still just P*e, regardless of column height.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

P-delta consideration or seismic loading would introduce some moment as well. If exposed to the wind, you can get some vibration issues as with stacks that you might not expect. Check if the column can be handled with its own weight. Pipe/round tubing might be cheaper than rectangular tubing.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

I would not worry about the moment due to eccentricity, I would be more concerned about the moment due to wind or seismic when combined with the axial load. And then you have drift......

My gut is telling me HSS 16x16 are on the small side for this building. You may want to consider precast columns. They won't look like toothpicks 80' in the air and would get erected pretty quick.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Yes, you should consider eccentricity, including accidental eccentricity due to tolerances, etc. Also be sure to consider "P-little delta" second-order effects. You might also consider using W14 columns with plates welded to the sides to create box sections.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Jumbo HSS sections are becoming more economical and readily available. I would at least give them a look before I started fabricating box sections out of W14s

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Don't forget the old rule of thumb that industrial facilities love to attach things to building columns down the road. This tall of a column I'd definitely have some extra capacity for when someone does attach something to the side of this.

Professional and Structural Engineer (ME, NH, MA)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Splices---it sounds like it's a design-build effort, if so talk to the contractor. You are asking helpful questions that can direct them toward an approach. Field splices, probably CJP flange welds with backing bar all around, will likely be high off the ground, labor-intensive, require special inspections, and I suspect there will be a lot of them. Arranging to ship 80' columns may be advantageous.

As MotorCity pointed out, lateral is critical. If you have 80' tall braced frames, chord columns will see higher loads, and the 80' out of plane buckling length still applies. May want to locate these at building corners where you can reduce that buckling length.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

(OP)
Thanks for the insight guys.

I estimated a drift value for the braced frames to check the impact of P-delta on the gravity columns. It's in a high seismic region and drifts will be significant.
I've never inquired about rolling or shipping 80' long sections. I think the trucking could be done at night with the correct permits. I've seen those large wind turbine blades shipped at night and they're much longer than 80'. I'll have to discuss with the client if I get the project.

There are going to be A LOT of these columns so I'll be pressured to skinny them as much as possible.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

One interesting facet of this is that the steel column design provisions that we use embody a Shanley style imperfection which is, analytically, a function of column length. That has good and bad associated with it:

1) A taller column implies a larger imperfection which will tend to dwarf the impact of the load eccentricity at the cap plate. Good.

2) Your splices will potentially be sources of abnormal imperfection. Bad. This might warrant some consideration, particularly with regard to splice locations (40'/40' versus, say 20'/40'/20').

I'm confused by the Big P-Delta concerns expressed here. Do we not only have Little P-delta to worry about for pin ended gravity columns? In my opinion, Big P-Delta only comes into play for the lateral system and any columns where end restraint is being considered. And I would hope that these 80' columns are not the lateral system (moment frame).

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

I agree with cliff234 about using W14 columns, with reserve capacity (per TME's comments), but without side plates. Since industrial application usually have a long useful life, maintenance is important. Neither an HSS nor a boxed column will allow routine inspection and painting inside for corrosion protection. Also, bolted connections to a W section are more practical. Welds are good, but for heavy loads we preferred bolts for our electric generating stations located in high wind / high seismic locations.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

kl/ry < 200, assuming we are abiding by that, dictates section options for steel.
Per jayrod, jumbo HSS probably lightest section. Those manufacturers will know shipping constraints too. Avoid splices.

sliderule makes a good point about corrosion. You'll have to balance this consideration with a shape that gives you the ry needed. Open shapes unlikely to work for ry, and built-up shapes add lots of labor cost. Consider HSS with "weep" holes or special treatment near the base.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

I think a little more information about the lateral system is needed before selection of the column type is made.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Quote (DETstru (Structural)(OP))

I estimated a drift value for the braced frames to check the impact of P-delta on the gravity columns.

Hokie, that's not enough info? Braced frames I would expect would be the only way to go on something this size. I can't even get 20ft moment frames to work reasonably. I can't imagine what the columns for an 80 ft moment frame would look like.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

If this building has a girt system for the cladding, your exterior columns with wind loads from girts will be a large driver for the size you may want to use.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

SRE's comments got me thinking that, one way or another, any eccentricity could be ironed out by providing a wide flange shape to attach the joist girders to. That could take the form of a WF column, a partially plated WF column, or an HSS cap detailed as shown below. The stub would impact the column buckling capacity not at all.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

(OP)
Braced frames for sure. I'm not sure if it'll end up as an SCBF or maybe BRB's.
The geometry will be interesting in an 80' tall by 50' wide bay. I have some ideas though.

structSU10, you're definitely right on that. The exterior wall wind loads will be significant. I'll probably need a lot of wide flange wind columns to handle the load.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

For interior corrosion, if you can cap the top and bottom so the column is airtight, that pretty well eliminates the concern.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Splice is to allow shipping of the two 40 foot sections, right?

Or do yo propose trucking an 80 foot column as a special traffic load?

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

(OP)
Yes, the splice is due to shipping/rolling challenges.

I'd prefer the columns be one piece but I've never specified a member that long. I don't know how long they can make them at the mill or if shipping them to the fab shop/site at that length is easy to do.

Even if they can make them that long and ship them that long, whoever the fabricator/erector/contractor is may not want to deal with an 80' long column. I'm really not sure. If I get the project I'll definitely recommend getting a contractor/fabricator on board early to discuss the best way to build this.

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Quote (DETstu)

I don't know how long they can make them at the mill...

Well, if you are insistent on using HSS, you need to find out. After all, the internet is at your fingertips... I looked into it (at least from one manufacturer) and it took less than 5 minutes:

60 feet, max. But I also found out that you are not "stuck" with choosing from "wimpy" standard sizes or thicknesses... of course the cost goes up, up, up. Don't rule out W sections. Read this: Link

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

Could you contact a local power/telecom pole fabricator and see if they could help? I think I've seen monopoles that long without a splice?

RE: 80' unbraced steel columns

(OP)
SRE/PMR06, thanks, great suggestions.

If I get the project this will be the first thing I tackle. I'm sure any fabricator I contact would love to get their hands on this project so they'd probably be willing to help me hash out the fabrication and constructability questions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources