×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tapped holes for structural member connection
4

Tapped holes for structural member connection

Tapped holes for structural member connection

(OP)
Alright I got a project that the vendor is trying to use tapped holes and a thread bolt for all their structural load bearing member connections. Essentially, their members are connecting to HSS tube steel and therefor a nut cannot be attached. Is there a code in California that prohibits this type of connection. The engaged depth of the bolt would only roughly 1/2"-3/4" thick or so. All common sense is telling me the head of the bolt would need to be welded to the connector plate but they are saying no. The structural frame is enclosing a mechanical system and I'm sure there will be vibration let alone we have to conform to ASCE 7-10 codes as well. I attached a detail for reference. any suggestions?

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

You will certainly have significantly less capacity in a tapped hole than with a nut.

We used to have connections similar to this in substations all the time. The easy option (if it meets your other project constraints) is to widen the connection in your section view to be wider than the top tube. We typically did it with a cap plate on the end of the vertical tube mating with a plate welded to the top tube, and 4 bolts between the two.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

Much depends on the bolt sizes, HSS wall thicknesses, and loads.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

I don't like the idea of using tapped holes in this situation but if you wanted to try and justify it, read on....

There are some papers that discuss methods for calculating stripping strength of threaded joints. I don't have them handy at the moment but Industrial fasteners institute has a nice 2 page tech bulletin that gives a straight forward procedure.

In general the thickness of the tapped element needs to be 1-2 times fastener diameter to develop the fastener but that is just based on my experience.

You want to make sure to get a decent number of threads engaged. UNC threads with thin material may mean you only get 1 or 2 threads engaged which I don't like.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

We've had this problem of using A325 bolts in A36 steel on some sub station transformers. This required a analysis from some ASME data and limited torqueing with special inspection. Not recommended by us.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

What HSS member has a 3/4" thick wall?

EIT

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

Deadblow, check out the Atlas tube website. They've got 3/4 wall on some of the 10x10 and bigger

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

I recently used the expansion bolts (Hollo-Bolts from Lindapter) on a project where welding was out of the question and I had to attach to hollow sections as well as a WF to which we only had access from one side. They worked well. Not cheap, but you're not spending any labor in tapping either. They have an ICC ES report with allowable uses and values.

Whether or not I'd use tapped holes would depend greatly on the loads and the size of hardware required. I believe you're outside of the RCSC recommendations and would be on your own for design. And if the loads allow, I'd be much more inclined to allow self drilling/tapping screws over some guy tapping into structural steel.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

Depending on the load, consider using "Nutserts"....works like a pop-rivet but provides a nut-like structure for bolting. I've used them numerous times in aluminum construction with thin-walled aluminum tubes. They are also available for steel applications.

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

We have run into this conundrum too on several occasions. On those cases where we didn't use box bolts, we elected to weld a thick plate to the face of the HSS member. The thick plate was pre-tapped for the bolted connection. The HSS member was pre-drilled with slightly larger oversized clearance holes, so the bolt wouldn't bottom out on the wall of the HSS. Maybe this will work for you?
Dave

Thaidavid

RE: Tapped holes for structural member connection

You are risking tremendous construction difficulties with dirt, rust, grit and garbage in the conventional tapped-hole-in-structural-member, plus the expense of drilling and tapping (er, machining) the large holes deep enough and accurate enough to allow the steel mis-alignment that will happen.

As above, use the inserts if you absolutely have to use a tapped hole.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources