×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Laminar => turbulent transition criteria
2

Laminar => turbulent transition criteria

Laminar => turbulent transition criteria

(OP)
Hello

Trying to define a few aerodynamic characteristics of a combat aircraft, I am looking for a criteria to calculate the position of the laminar/turbulent transition on a delta wing (typical combat aircraft).
I am not looking for something very sophisticated, but a simple relation suitable for preliminary design studies, based for instance on the profile length Reynolds number.
Does anyone know anything that could help me ?

Thank you for your suggestions !

Best regards
Nicolas

RE: Laminar => turbulent transition criteria

I don't know about the outside of the aircraft but in the engine we would approximate (for simple calcs)the wing as a cylinder in cross flow for the leading edge and then flow over curved plate for the rest of the wing.  Your Re# is also going to be dependent on your flight point (altitude, hot day or cold day(at low altitudes), and speed).  The basic Re# equation should suffice for the cylinder and flat plate, just the characteristic length variable would need to be adjusted for cylinder or plate.  An intro aero book should cover this and I would suggest double checking me, I'm a simple mech eng grunt, not an aero guy.

RE: Laminar => turbulent transition criteria

2
koila,

You may be in luck: for preliminary design efforts, there are couple ways you could approach this, depending on how optimistic you are...

The standard approach is to assume that transition occurs immediately--there is no laminar flow.  This isn't as pessimistic as it may seem; all the real-life things that can cause early transition (dirt, bugs, dents, bumps, scratches, waviness) tend to congregrate at leading edges of aerodynamic surfaces (where the flow starts).

Assuming entirely turbulent flow can be overly conservative if you're looking at planes where extra attention has been given to the construction of smooth surfaces, long favourable pressure gradients, and long term cleaning of surfaces.  Given that, I think it would be reasonable to assume that laminar flow could be maintained along favourable pressure gradients (basically, where the object cross-section is steadily increasing, like tapered noses and wing leading edges and such) until the flow gets to the first skin joint, or row of fasteners, or other surface discontinuity.  IMHO, there are very few aircraft that this approach could reasonably apply to, though.  Mostly one-off, composite aircraft.

It might interest you to know that NACA tests on actual production aircraft wings gave pretty much the same drag coefficient (~.008) regardless of airfoil section. These would all be rivetted metallic structures.

I hope that's helpful, it probably isn't what you were looking for, but may be what you need.

Regards

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources