×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Replacement of Economiser

Replacement of Economiser

Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
We have been planning replacement of complete economizer banks in 500MW boiler of 25 years old. We planned sponge ball testing for thoroughness check of new coils before welding. Chemical flushing ( DM filling and ammonia dosing for up to 9.5 pH)of new banks after complete erection. Please discuss best methodology in this aspect.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

As long as the replacement tube banks had been capped from the tube fabrication shop what you proposed seems acceptable. I would probably perform a borescope inspection on a random sampling of tubes after uncapping to ensure the ID surfaces are clean as well.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
Does steam blowing add any value

RE: Replacement of Economiser

Only if, upon borescope inspection, you find trapped debris.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
What are the disadvantages, if we don't see in borescope and resort to steam blowing?

RE: Replacement of Economiser

People often borescope so that they can examine the tie-in welds and internal surface condition.
It is good to know and record photos so that when you look again in 5 years you can see if it has changed.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Replacement of Economiser

"What are the disadvantages, if we don't see in borescope and resort to steam blowing?"

None, other than the neighbors. Steam blow is LOUD if properly done. And you need to build and anchor the temporary discharge pipe. I prefer blowing, myself. Borescoping hundreds & hundreds of tubes is boring. If you get inattentive, or the snaky scope curls at the wrong moment, you could miss a nut or die-grinder bit. The steam misses nothing, assuming that the pressure & velocity are adequate.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
Thank you all for the discussion. Perfect cleaning is interesting but steam blowing with inadequate pressure and velocity can cause chemical corrosion due to the condensation and trapped debris if any. I feel sufficient airblowing and chemical flushing at 0.5pH will be better and effective.

The Coils are almost 12mt length and 10 bends/loops ( total length of 288mt each), which needs extra care in maintaining steam pressure and temperature. In addition the coils will be lifted for positioning and welding, where the debris generated from weld also react with the water entrapped.

Please discuss further.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
correction : each coil of 12mt length with 24bends ( total length of coil 288mt)

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
correction 9.5pH

RE: Replacement of Economiser

Inadequate compressed air volume & velocity is much more common & likely than inadequate steam.

RE: Replacement of Economiser

(OP)
How to calculate steam source requirement?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources