×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring
2

Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

(OP)
Is it recommended to use shielded cable for CT and/or PT secondary wiring?

I'm working on a design for a small substation that will have MV cable and CT/PT/control wiring in the same concrete encased duct bank. Obviously the MV will be in separate conduits from the LV wiring. What's the minimum separation between MV and LV conduits you would be comfortable with and would you use shielded cable for the PT/CT secondaries?

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

absolutely!

Make sure your cable shields are only grounded at one end.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

(OP)
Thanks for the response!

Are you sure about only grounding one end of the shield though? The majority of what I've read so far recommended grounding both ends in this situation, at least for the CT wiring.

A typical 4-20mA signal cable should definitely only be grounded on one end, so it seems to me that we should only ground one end of the PT cables, but I don't believe grounding both ends of the CT cables would cause problems. But maybe it's a safer bet to just ground one end for the CTs too.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

I'm sorry Fritzy, you are correct. Must of had a brain fart, not sure why I would write that. Shield grounded at both ends.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Make sure the length of your bonding conductors connecting the cable shield to ground are as short as possible. Grounding via a cable gland will give you the best result.

Ideally, the total length (from both ends of the cable) of the grounding bonding conductor for the cable shield should be less than 1% of the length of the cable run. This will give best result for transient suppression for the really high frequency noise you get from the arc of an opening disconnect for example.

See, for every bad bit of info I give, I'll have something good to use as well :)

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

(OP)
Marks, thanks for all the info. Understood, we'll ground the CT wiring on both ends and keep the bonding conductors as short as possible.

What's your opinion on the PT wiring? Seems like it might be wise to only ground one end since they should be carrying almost no current.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

I ground the PT cable shields the same way as for CTs. This should keep the voltage profile at each end of the cable shield the same.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Quote (Fritzy92)

we'll ground the CT wiring on both ends...
Mistyped perhaps? The shield is grounded at both ends, the secondary wiring is grounded at one location; usually at the 1st point of use.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

(OP)

Quote (stevenal)

Mistyped perhaps? The shield is grounded at both ends, the secondary wiring is grounded at one location; usually at the 1st point of use.

Yes, that was a mistype. Shield grounded on both ends, CT secondary only grounded at 1st point of use.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

My utility does not use shielded cable for CT or PT wiring in medium voltage or 115 kV substations, consistent with IEEE 525. If you do use shielded cable, ground both ends of the sheild. In order to avoid damaging the shield from excess current flow, you must run a large ground wire in close proximity to the shielded cable as explained in IEEE 525 Section G.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Good addition bacon! Minimizing the geometric area between your grounded cable shield and the ground grid will lead to better transient suppression.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Hi Fritzy92,
I have never used shielded cables for CT or PT circuits. However I have been limited to industrial (with limited utility) experience.

BTW, we are talking about (nominal) 5A CT and 120V PT circuits, right?

I am curious as to what type of LV cable is available in shielded construction. other than shielded instrument cables?

Historically I have used (Canadian) TECK type cables for CT & PT signals. For CT signals usually it's a #10awg conductor (or larger), and for PT signals it's usually #14awg or #12awg. TECK is similar to type MC.
TECK is available in shielded construction, but not till 5kV and #1awg in size.

Well, that's aboot all I have to say about that, eh!

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

(OP)
Thanks for all the responses, definitely some good information!

I'll start by saying that this is not for a utility substation, it's actually for a MV rotary UPS at an industrial facility. The wiring in question must run from the UPS SWGR enclosure to the UPS enclosure (SWGR and UPS will be located in two separate outdoor walk-in enclosures).

Yes, we're talking about typical 5A CTs and 120V PTs (although some of the CTs are 1A secondary).

Here's what I had in mind if using shielded cable:
http://www.houwire.com/hw152/
#10 4/C for the CTs & #12 4/C for the PTs.

Since I don't have access to IEEE 525 currently, and it's starting to seem to me that shielding may not be necessary (since so many places go without it), I'm leaning toward using un-shielded cable and increasing the spacing between MV conduits and control conduits in my duct. Opinions?

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

We are always ground shield of any control cable ( include CT, VT) on the both side.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Quote (Bacon4life)

My utility does not use shielded cable for CT or PT wiring in medium voltage or 115 kV substations, consistent with IEEE 525. If you do use shielded cable, ground both ends of the sheild. In order to avoid damaging the shield from excess current flow, you must run a large ground wire in close proximity to the shielded cable as explained in IEEE 525 Section G.


X2. To this day I never understood shielding of CT and PT cables. Perhaps if high accuracy is needed (guessing) but for typical protection class equipment I do not see a need.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

I agree with Mbrooke; shielding of these CT & PT cables is not required. Even more so since (the OP) indicates that the MV conductors will be installed in conduit. Since the MV conductors are surely to be shielded, and I'll assume some form of metallic conduit, you will not have any issues with noise. As far as spacing is concerned, I would think a couple of feet would be prudent, assuming that you are not running parallel for hundreds of feet.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

For what it is worth, I am changing out 2 138kV Oil Circuit Breakers soon. The existing cabling to the breakers is a 27 conductor unshielded cable. This includes CT's and all other controls/status from the breaker. Sub is about 40 years old (replacing E/M distance /BF/Reclosing relays as well). The distance from the control house to the breakers is 260'. So, unshielded cables seemed to work fine for many years.

The new control cables will be separated (CT's, controls, AC/DC), and the CT cables will be shielded at both ends. New utility practice, I guess.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Can you ask them why? Thats strange imo.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

DTR2011 I think it's a good idea to seperate the analog signals from the controls. You may have gotten away with that set up with electro-mech relaying, but if you're moving to IEDs you would likely be dealing with a lot of mis-ops.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Might be going off on a tangent here but I am curious. What's the advantage of grounding on both sides? wouldn't that create circulating currents via inductance?

What about grounding a CT Circuit in more than 2 points? IE: 2 Marshalling Rack points and at the modules?

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Avoid grounding the CT cct more than once to prevent circulating current, which can directly effect relay operation.

Ground the CT cable shield at both ends (with proper techniques) for transient suppression. This is more important when running cables in a swithcyard where you will have exposure to a lot of different types of transient noise.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

@marks1080-

I am a contractor commissioning engineer. Many of the stations in my area have changed ownership several times over the years. There is a new owner that is trying to upgrade the system, over time. In the case of the 27 conductor unshielded cable, we are changing out OCB's for GCB's and part of that is new shielded cables for CT's, with each CT set having its own dedicated cable & shield. The old cable was originally connected to EM relays + a SEL 221.

I've been in larger 345/138/25kV stations with similar 27 conductor cables and if a feeder breaker is open, the amount of induced signal is crazy / scary and can lead to all kinds of erroneous readings.

I do not disagree with what you have said, I was only pointing out that these things do exist in older stations.

RE: Shielded Cable for CT & PT Wiring

Thanks DTR2011,

I completely agree, and would go as far to say that these problems exist way more in older stations. I believe partly because of brown field work over the years, perhaps being done to different standards. Partly to changes in work practices. Partly to the fact that the older EM relays were much more resilient to transients. So it's not necessarily that the problem wasn't always there, just that the consequence was not nearly as bad.

Most of my experience has been with older HV stations, which I prefer. They're more interesting work environments than the brand new installations. I've seen some EM relays get toasted, but not nearly on the scale that we've seen the newer IEDs get toasted. I've seen quite a few CVT boxes damaged as well. The particular CVTs we use (talking 230/500kV) are unusually high in capacitance, which can create even more problems with transients.

In my experience, proper grounding (and more importantly - proper grounding techniques) are not given the priority they deserve. I've seen teams of people chase gremlins in a system when the entire problem was a grounding conductor too long, or some cable was not properly shielded.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources