×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

(OP)
This is purely out of curiosity.

I was checking the densities of all the steel shapes in the AISC database to see how close they are to 490 PCF by taking the Weight / Area * 144. Just for fun.

I noticed that closed shapes such as HSS and Pipe have densities around 525 pcf, while all other shapes have around 490 pcf.

Did anyone realize this? Is the density of A500 and A53 steel 525 pcf instead of 490?



Also things to note are:

Lighter shapes have more variance (likely rounding errors).

Pipe12XS has the highest density at 539 pcf.

M4x3.2 has the lowest density at 456 pcf.

This made me realize that the M4x3.2 is the exact same shape as the M4x3.45 EXCEPT it weighs 0.25 plf less. Every other single property is the same. Does anyone know why?

RE: AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

Steel shapes, W, S, M, HP, etc., have been allowed + 2.5% variation on both area and weight. At 490 lb/ft3 that is a range of 478 lb/ft3 to 502 lb/ft3, which matches your graph for shapes very nicely.

Quote (AISC Modern Steel Construction Magazine)

ASTM A500 permits wall thickness to be as much as 10% less than the specified nominal thickness compared to a 2.5% variation permitted in wide-flange shapes. To account for this larger variation, AISC Specification Section B4.2 requires that the design wall thickness must be taken as 93% of the nominal wall thickness.

This makes steel "appear" to be 7% heavier than it is. Therefore 490 lb/ft3 x 1.07 = 524 lb/ft3
The 524 lb/ft3 value is near the median of the HSS cluster on your graph. I suppose the spread around that median is from expected variations (similar to the allowable steel shapes variations.)

ASTM A1085-13 is changing all this. See this Modern Steel Construction article: Link

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

I am guessing the discrepancy for HSS is because the area is calculated using 93% of the nominal wall thickness while the weight uses 100% of the wall thickness. 93% of 525pcf is 488pcf. See AISC 360 section B4.2 for the requirement to use 93% of the wall thickness for HSS design.

RE: AISC Steel Shape Densities, and M4x3.45 vs M4x3.2

(OP)
That makes sense. Thanks!

What about the M4x3.2 being the same shape as the M4x3.45, yet weighing 0.25 plf less?

Any ideas?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources