×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

(OP)
For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bulb tees), how can I show expediantly than intermediate diaphragms are not required.  (If I can eliminate the intermediate diaphragms, I can save the contractor approx. $200,000.)

I appreciate any guidance.

RE: For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

Good Luck.  Most state bridge manuals require diaphragms for use with even moderate lengths (50-100).  The single concern I would have outside of design of the bridge is the erection of those girders.  Bulb tees are girders with relatively small bases, tall webs, and large flanges.  This adds up to a critical situation with wind loading during erection.  Or for that matter if something were to bump the girders during erection.  

It seems that an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of remedy...

RE: For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

rowe,

I believe that you are stuck calculating horizontal bending in the bulb under wind loading.  Much like a steel bridge, you can assume half of the wind loading is carried by the deck, and the other half in horizontal bending of the bulb.

For spans such as you describe, I would call for temporary diaphragms for erection at quarter points, and (probably)permanent diaphragms at piers and midspan only.

Have fun!

RE: For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

(OP)
Qshake & Curvbridger - Thanks for your responses.

The P/S bulb tees will be cast with inserts to attach temporary lateral bracing (x-frames) at the mid-point.  However, the DOT will not allow permanent steel bracing.

The DOT requires an intermediate diagphragm unless it is shown in calculations that there is no need for it.

I can calculate the torsional load on the section due to wind and compare it to the allowable torsion (ACI).  But the stability equation for lateral torsional buckling only determines the critical bending moment and not a "torsional load".  How do I "add" the effects of bending to the torsional load from wind?

RE: For 3-138' continuous spans (P/S bu

Greetings, Rowe :

I concur with QShake that lateral bracing during erection should be used -- especially with bulb tee's.

Since these appear to be continuous girders, your bottom flanges will not always be in tension -- hence, lateral bracing may be required anyway. If they were simple span, the bottom flange remains in tension (no bracing), and the top flange (compression) would be braced by the deck.

Is torsional loading going to occur during erection? If the beams are not anchored at the support, the only resistance to twisting would be the beam itself.

To check the horizontal bending, use the beam's properties about the weak axis, with the wind acting as a uniform load. If you exceed any of the compressive or tensile stress limits (0.60 f'ci or 3*sqrt(f'ci)), you'll need bracing (to limit L).

I hope this helps!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources