×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

(OP)
Hello,

Recently I submitted a structural analysis report to a major aerospace prime for an electronics enclosure (read 'box') we are under contract to design. The box is supported by four bolts at each corner. As part of my stress report I did a FBD showing the free-body reaction at each of the bolts due to the applied load factors (some acceleration in all 3 axis simultaneously).

In the FE model I am modeling the bolts as springs (think CBUSH) of stiffness equivalent to the bolt stiffness axially and arbitrarily 100x bolt stiffness in the bolt shear direction.

The problem arises in that the FBD reactions do not match the FE reactions because the high shear restraint makes the structure indeterminate. The reviewer did not like that the FE reactions differed from the FBD reactions and that the FE reaction loads were pretty uneven among the 4 bolts of the basically symmetric structure.

The reason the FE reactions are uneven is because of the Poisson effect internal forces are generated between the rigid supports. When I relax the shear stiffness of the supports the FE solution approaches the FBD solution.

I am a new analyst and I believe this issue is probably very common.

How do you account for comparing a FBD to FEA results when a structure is indeterminately supported and develops internal (Poisson related) forces?

Thanks,

RE: Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

If you use "rigid" bolts, either via rigid elements or very stiff cbush spring stiffness, you will get unrealistic fastener loads from the FEM.

Search eng-tips and/or google for "huth fastener flexibility" formulas for calculating in-plane (shear) stiffness values.

RE: Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

however you've supported your model ('cause it's not really clear to me), if the FEA results don't match simple hand calc FBD (given a simple structure, like a box) then there's something to be explained.

but i have to ask, why do FEA on an electronics box enclosure ? i'd've thought that you should be able to react large inertial accelerations with any sort of fasteners ? based on a simple hand calc.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

(OP)
Thanks for your response.

I will look at the Huth formula and see if I can come up with a good argument to reduce shear stiffness of my CBUSH supports.

As for why we are doing a full FEA study that's a good question --a detailed stress analysis is a contractual requirement here.


RE: Accounting for internal forces when comparing FEA reactions to FBD

A detailed stress analysis does NOT require a FEM. Cripe.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources