×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

(OP)
Can someone tell me if this rule still applies?  I have heard that there has been an update to the rule, however that's all I know.  If anyone can shed some light on this topic it would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Bluemax89

RE: 2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

CAUTION! It is only valid if the hydrotest pressure of the lowpressure-rated side equals or exceeds the design pressure of the HP side. With a 150% hydrotest, which used to be the case, this became the 2/3 rule. BUT current standards (ref. ASME Sect. 8) have dropped the hydrotest pressure relative to design pressure so now the rule is likelier to be 3/4. Check the relevant code which is being used.

RE: 2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

The intent of the 2/3s rule (or whatever we have to call it now) is that in the event of tube rupture (which is quite rare) is that the lower pressure side is not pressurized above its hydrotest pressure.  If you remember that, you'll be fine.

All, the rule applies to the entire system including upstream and downstream piping that would be pressurized to the tube rupture pressure (whatever you work that out to be), you can't just stop at the exchanger's flanges and ignore everything else.

RE: 2/3 Rule for Heat Exchangers

Yes, with the new allowable stress values in the code, what we called the 2/3's rule must be changed and we now need to verify the hydrotest pressure - assuming (that word again) the fabricator applied the code correctly.

The more you learn, the less you are certain of.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources