×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Code interpretation regarding IBC 2012 1613.3.5.1 Alternative seismic design category determination

Code interpretation regarding IBC 2012 1613.3.5.1 Alternative seismic design category determination

Code interpretation regarding IBC 2012 1613.3.5.1 Alternative seismic design category determination

(OP)
I have never used IBC 1613.5.6.1 provision before and just want to make sure that I am interpreting it correctly so I was hoping that someone would help me out. Our client has a one-story masonry industrial building located in a low seismic area (Category A using IBC Table 1613.5.6(1) and category B using Table 1613.5.6(2)). I am trying to use IBC 2012 provision 1613.3.5.1 and use seismic category A so that I can use empirical approach of masonry code when evaluating how many window openings we can fit in the plain ordinary unreinforced masonry shear walls. The text of 1613.3.5.1 reads as the following.

"1613.3.5.1 Alternative seismic design category determination.
Where S1 is less than 0.75, the seismic design category is permitted to be determined from Table 1613.3.5(1) alone when all of the following apply:

1. In each of the two orthogonal directions, the approximate fundamental period of the structure, Ta, in each of the two orthogonal directions determined in accordance with Section 12.8.2.1 of ASCE 7, is less than 0.8 Ts determined in accordance with Section 11.4.5 of ASCE 7.

2. In each of the two orthogonal directions, the fundamental period of the structure used to calculate the story drift is less than Ts.

3. Equation 12.8-2 of ASCE 7 is used to determine the seismic response coefficient, Cs.

4. The diaphragms are rigid as defined in Section 12.3.1 of ASCE 7 or, for diaphragms that are flexible, the distances between vertical elements of the seismic force-resisting system do not exceed 40 feet (12 192 mm)."

Point #1 and #3 are satisfied in my case. Concerning point #2, according to the following thread http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=310703 I have to do another calculation for base shear using the computed fundamental period of the structure and check story drift limits. As far as #4 is concerned, I believe that by "distances between vertical elements" they mean spacing of my shear walls in one direction should not exceed 40 ft (ie. spacing of shear walls from East to West direction needs to be less than 40 ft when seismic force is acting longitudinally on the East - West walls (along long direction NOT normal to the walls) and when seismic force is acting on the North - South walls, then the longitudinal spacing along North - South shear walls needs to be less than 40 ft). Would that be correct interpretation? Basically, I am trying to make sure that they don't mean spacing of 40 ft between shear walls in BOTH directions simultaneously between all shear walls since my building shell is 60' wide and over 100' long and there are no interior shear walls (see attached rough draft). I believe I'm overthinking it but better safe than sorry so I figured I'd ask.

Thanks in advance for any comments.



RE: Code interpretation regarding IBC 2012 1613.3.5.1 Alternative seismic design category determination

Yes, your shear walls cannot be spaced more than 40 feet apart. If you are using untopped metal roof deck, then you are outside the code accepted limits of the rigid diaphragm assumption and you cannot use the exception. See ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.1.2.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources