×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

(OP)
Has anyone given any thought to the appropriate arc gap or working distance for voltages over 15 kV for arc flash studies... say 34.5kV or 69kV? The suggestions by OSHA seem too small in my opinion. If you consider arc gap for 69 kV, they suggest an arc gap of 0.1* V_LG (approximate dielectric strength of air). That comes out to only 4". If you look at youtube arcing videos, arcs are far longer than 4". As energy is proportional to arc gap, that could be a significant underestimation.

15" seems a reasonable assumption of working distance for 34.5 kV (IEEE recommended for 12.47 kV), as people may glove 34.5. What would you consider a reasonable distance for 69 kV? Would you even worry about calculating energy at that voltage?

Thanks for your thoughts.

RE: Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

Not sure about the youtube videos but is it possible that what you are seeing on the video is after the arc has started and has elongated due to magnetic forces and ionization of the air. Until the dielectric threshold is breached there should be no arc. Of course, one could use a higher value of gap to be conservative but that will increase the incident energy. At what point have you gotten too conservative to the point where linemen have to wear cumbersome PPE?

OSHA states a 15 inch working distance for gloving, so that is the value that needs to be used. As far as 69KV, I assume this is hot stick work, so what is minimum stick length used? 3 feet? Of course, that 3 ft is the length of the stick which does not always equate to worker distance as the distance may be shorter based on how the stick is gripped and used.

I assume you are using ArcPro for this?

RE: Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

For the arc gap, I used two equations, one for line-ground (VLG[kV] * mult * 0.1) and one for line-line arcs (VLL[kV] * mult * 0.1). The multiplier was pulled from the new OSHA standard for calculating the MAD distance based on the maximum transient overvoltage possible, mult=3 for 72.5kV and below. I felt including this transient overvoltage was proper, whether it's right or wrong, the transient multiplier results in a higher arc flash energy for ArcPro (worst case scenario is better in arc flash studies right?)

For the distance to the arc, I utilize two methods. For under 46kV where energized work is allowed, the working distance is 15". Although our safety standards do not allow us to perform energized work above 46kV, I utilized the MAD (from OSHA) as the working distance since the MAD must be observed at all times. This allows for the scenario where perhaps distribution under-build is being worked energized with both circuits set to hot line mode.

RE: Arc Gap and Working Distance for Higher Voltages

(OP)
For the working distance, that's what I do. I use Table R-6 rather than calculating it, but that seems appropriate. Arc gap is more of a question to me. I'll often use 20", as that's the greatest gap that ARCPRO has been validated against. My thought is that it's far more conservative than OSHA's gap length, and the incident energy is often pretty small in my scenarios anyway. I just wish I had a little more technical justification than "seems about right."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources