×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Footing Stability Ratio

Footing Stability Ratio

Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
If a soil supported mat supports 4 piers with 2 of the piers subjected to compressive loads and the other 2 piers subjected to uplift loads for a certain load combination, what is the correct way to calculate stability ratio about an edge of the mat?

1. Would the uplift loads contribute to the overturning moment about an edge of the footing or is it just the applied shears and moments on the piers that contribute to overturning?
2. In continuation of 1 above, in calculating resisting moment, is it appropriate to algebraically add all the vertical loads on the piers (both compressive and uplift), add the weight of the piers, footing and the soil and use this resultant load as contributing towards resisting?
3. In general, SR is defined as Mr/Mo where Mr is the resisting moment and Mo is the overturning moment. Would SR = L/2e be correct under all circumstances and equate to SR calculated using Mr/Mo?

Thank you

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

In recent years, codes have moved away from using a "stability ratio" to check overturning, uplift, etc. The proper way to design is to use 0.6*DL in the various load combinations. Then, either the design works or it doesn't. There is no checking a factor of safety against overturning and/or uplift.

DaveAtkins

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
Thank you for your response.

Is that true? ACI 336.2R states that overturning must be considered for combined footings and mats.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Overturning must be considered. But there's no stability ratio like the old working stress days.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Google Figure 10-3 Distribution of bearing pressures, and go to images. Should be one of the first few images.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Yes, you still need to check overturning. Dave is merely stating that the factor of safety is included in the design load combinations so there's no need to reduce your capacity, etc. to provide a factor of safety. All loads will contribute to the overturning or resist the overturning (unless it acts at the point you're summing moments). Sum moments about a corner of your mat and that's how you calculate the overturning. I would include the weight of the mat but not the weight of the piers or the soil since it is supporting the mat in your overturning calculation.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
Does that mean that if appropriate load combinations with 0.6DL etc. are considered for soil stability calculations then in checking overturning, all that needs to be checked is that the resisting moment >= overturning?

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Correct. The safety factor is baked into the load combinations.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
Section 4.3 - Overturning calculations in ACI 336.2R (Analysis and Design of Combined Footings and Mats) still states that the stability ratio should generally not be less than 1.5. Is this because this publication has not been updated in lieu of the above discussion regarding using appropriate load combinations such as 0.6DL or am I missing something?

Thank you all for your responses.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Using that stability ratio you would get to account for 100% of your dead load as resisting. Or you use 0.6D and check against unity.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

The proper load combinations are outlined in ASCE 7 which references the ACI documents, not in the actual ACI document. Typically, we overestimate the dead load to be conservative for gravity loads, so you should really be using 90% of your dead load (see LRFD combinations). The 1.5 safety factor comes from 0.9/0.6=1.5. That's how it's baked into the combinations.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Quote (OP)

1. Would the uplift loads contribute to the overturning moment about an edge of the footing or is it just the applied shears and moments on the piers that contribute to overturning?

Definitely the uplift would contribute.

Quote (OP)

2. In continuation of 1 above, in calculating resisting moment, is it appropriate to algebraically add all the vertical loads on the piers (both compressive and uplift), add the weight of the piers, footing and the soil and use this resultant load as contributing towards resisting?

I'll include any resisting load that I'm confident will be present during whatever environment will create the overturning tendency. I'll take foundation weight, piers, columns, structural walls, soil, slab on grade... I won't include live load, snow load, equipment, or architectural finishes with the rare exception of where those things are actually the cause of the overturning.

Quote (OP)

3. In general, SR is defined as Mr/Mo where Mr is the resisting moment and Mo is the overturning moment. Would SR = L/2e be correct under all circumstances and equate to SR calculated using Mr/Mo?]

The e<L/2 business should still apply in principle if you do it like this:

1) e must include all load effects.
2) apply your load factors as discussed above.
3) instead of e<L/2 just determine whether or not your aggregate eccentric load still lands on the footing.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
Thank you all for your responses.

The attached pdf shows 2 different methods of calculating overturning moments and resisting moments for the same foundation loads and geometry. It seems that both of these methods are being used. Which method is the correct way to calculate overturning moments?

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

Method 1 is a check of overturning. Method 2 would be used to determine bearing pressures under the footing, due to the applied loads.

I would not use either method. I would check the footing for the various applicable load combinations per code (you don't show what load combination has yielded the P loads). As I said before, if the footing is not overturning assuming 0.6DL, then stability is satisfied. But the load case with 0.6DL may or may not give you the highest bearing pressure.

DaveAtkins

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

(OP)
So let's say we have two unfactored load combinations 1. DL + WL and 2. 0.6DL + WL. In either case is overturning considered satisfied as long as resisting moments >= overturning moments without regard to the actual ratio of the resisting moment to overturning moment?

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

For overturning, I can't envision how DL + WL would ever control over 0.6DL + WL. But to answer your question, when you check the 0.6DL + WL combination, the FS against overturning is built into the load combination. Or "baked" into the load combination, as "Chef" jayrod12 would saybigsmile

DaveAtkins

RE: Footing Stability Ratio

You should be referencing the pertinent building code for design load combinations. In ASCE 7-05 the uplift combination is 0.6DL + 1.0WL but it changed to 0.6DL + 0.6WL for ASCE 7-10 since the wind limit state was changed. You also need to examine every load combination and design for the worst case.

My previous post explained how the safety factor is included in the combination.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources