×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?
2

Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

(OP)
We have a vessel that has seen an internal fire. The temperatures hit the temperature limit of the probes at 850F. The temps went from ambient to above 850 back to ambient in 4 days time. I know there is the possibility of (low possibility) Sensitization. However, corrosion resistance is not an issue because it in a non-corrosive process. My engineer is insisting on hardness testing be performed. I disagree. I have done a lot of hardness testing in many different plants but never on stainless.
What information would we gain from hardness testing 316L? What method should be used, Portable Vickers, Brinell? Does anyone know the acceptable ranges of hardness for 316L SS? I can't seen to find any ranges listed anywhere.

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

I would not waste my time with hardness testing because 316L stainless is not hardenable by heat treatment. Worst case, I would perform a good visual examination and look for warpage or buckling.

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

I agree with Metengr, it would be a waste of time.
Sagging or warping would be where I would look.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

(OP)
Both of your answers confirm what I have read everywhere else. Thanks for the quick reply guys.

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

found this on the web
HEAT TREATING

316/316L is not hardenable by heat treatment. Cold working increases tensile strength and hardness. Annealing range is between 1850° and 2050°F. Cool rapidly. Water should be used for heavier sections; air for lighter sections. The stress relieving range is between 400° and 750°F.
edit
added
http://www.aksteel.com/pdf/markets_products/stainl...

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

(OP)
Would performing Ferrite Testing tell us anything? Could we do this in-lieu of in-situ metallography?

RE: Is there any reason that 316L Stainless Steel would need hardness tested after a fire?

Not that I can think of. Unless you think that you reached 1800F, in which case your structure is a bigger issue.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources