×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

(OP)
I am designing an I-beam for torsion.

The FE-program gives the St. Venant torsion. Is it allowed to design the I-beam using this St. Venant torsion only (and neglecting the warping torsion)? Is it a conservative assumption?

Eurocode states that I-beams shall be designed to warping torsion. But on the other hand the plasticity theory states that every equilibrium system that does not violate the yield strength is a safe approximation of the carrying capacity of the structure.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

Well, ignoring warping is not a conservative assumption as far as stress goes. It's conservative to ignore for deflection.

In some cases (support condition and loading), you could argue that warping isn't going to be very significant in the final design. But, it is best to do this from a position of knowledge.... after first estimating warping stresses.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

1) If you ignore warping flexibility restraint you will always underestimate overestimate twisting deformation. In the case of an I section, your underestimate overestimate is likely to be a gross underestimate overestimate as warping flexibility restraint in such a section is usually a major contributor to rotational flexibility stiffness.

2) Section warping will introduce axial stresses in the flanges which will interact with the axial stresses imposed by the flexural and axial loads applied to the member causing first yields to occur sooner and asymmetrically.

3) If your software doesn't model warping flexibility stiffness, then it will be overestimating underestimating the torsional stiffness of the members and the amount of torsional force drawn to them. You'll want to keep an eye on that.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

If you are sizing a beam for torsion based on pure torsion only (St Venant) then you will be selecting a beam that is significantly larger than required. This is probably conservative, but the numbers should be checked. A quick check for warping stress can be done by considering just one flange under a lateral load* equal to torsion / (centroid distance between flanges) *point load or distributed depending on the torsional load distribution. This lateral bending/normal stress will act in conjunction with the beams other bending stresses. Check that these normal stresses do not exceed your allowable beam stress (does not violate the yield strength).

This approach is conservative for calculating the normal stresses because:
- you are ignoring the torsion taken by pure torsion action
- you are ignoring any contribution from the web

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

KootK -

Just a quick correction on item #1. The warping effect adds stiffness to the section. Therefore, when you ignore the warping effect your twist is much, much higher for I beams.

That in turn makes item #3 incorrect as well. If your software ignores warping in the stiffness calculation, then the analysis will underestimate the amount of torsional force drawn to the member.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

Fundamentally it should be okay for ultimate limit states - the flanges will yield under the added axial load and load should be taken by pure torsion. In saying this, you would need to check the section under service load to make sure you aren't yielding the flanges in that case. In which case you are already checking warping so you haven't saved any time.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

Quote (JoshPlum)

Just a quick correction...

A pretty fundamental correction I'd say. Having given it some careful consideration, I agree on all counts. Thanks for taking the time to set me straight.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

(OP)
Thanks for all the answers!

I have another question:
I have an I-beam welded to a RHS-columns (no stiffener plates in the joint). The width of the beam flanges and width of the RHS-column is the same. Is this joint restraint for warping?

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

Nope. The column section can warp and the column itself rotate. If you want warping restraint at the ends, welding insome side plates is probably your best bet. Otherwise, your only warping restraint is that brought about near midspan as a result of symmetry.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

Actually, to the extent that you can convincingly connect the beam flanges to the RHS walls parallel to be beam, you could use the side walls of the RHS similar to how side plates on the flanges are used. Do you want warping restraint here or are you trying to avoid it?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: St. Venant vs Warping torsion for I-beams

(OP)
I am trying to avoid it to be restraint.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources