×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Recording Meetings
5

Recording Meetings

Recording Meetings

(OP)
This post is will hopefully benefit someone who was like me a few years ago, starting out, wondering "how to do it" in terms of solid business practices.

After just going through a 'difference' in opinion on what was said during a project meeting that meant the difference between me being wrong (and sued) and the client eating their fair share of blame, I just wanted to say that if you are an engineer and you have clients, you need to audio record your meetings.

The audio recorders are so cheap, and these days small (about the size of a small candy bar), relative to a "he said said you said" conversation, there is no comparison.

An audio recording is undeniable, keeps people honest (because they know you recorded them) and is worth its weight 20 times over in solid gold in terms of protecting you from getting sued. Honest clients appreciate you doing it because it shows that you value what they say.

My only regret is not making routine audio recordings of all my client meetings sooner. Hopefully this helps someone out.

RE: Recording Meetings

first of all, check the local laws. There is a federal one-consent law, but some states require consent of all parties to the conversation.
https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03...

Second, ask your client, not all appreciate it.

Use your cell phone to do the recording, you probably don't need another device

RE: Recording Meetings

And in the intelligence community, if I were to even attempt to record someone I would not only find myself out of a job, I would likely find myself in jail.

Perhaps the best solution is to send an email with the salient points as you understood them. The receiver has an opportunity to correct/clarify any misunderstandings, and it's now a written record that both parties are agreeing to. Arguing against such a record in court is an uphill climb... if the receiver changes his mind later, you have proof that was not their original viewpoint.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Recording Meetings

About 20 years ago, after going through numerous disputes after pre-construction conferences, I made the decision to have court reporter at a pre-roofing conference for a large public school re-roofing project. There were numerous complaints from the attendees, but the bottom line was that there would be no discrepancy as to the discussion. While there was spirited debate during the pre-con, there were NO challenges to the decisions made during the pre-con and no claims thereafter of not being informed of the design and expected QC issues. In short....money well spent for the actual documentation and the intimidation factor!

Point 2....if you have a lawyer in a meeting, they will generally vehemently resist recording the meeting! I had one tell me once "if you record this meeting it is over right now!"

RE: Recording Meetings

Ron - that may be a sign to run away from that client...

Please remember: we're not all guys!

RE: Recording Meetings

We're specifically not allowed to record meetings. The best design teams I ever attended we used to write the minutes together /as the discussion occurred/. That is, the actual intent of the meeting was to produce a coherent set of minuted decisions. Since that is presumably the intent of many meetings I am astonished that this excellent practice was allowed to die out.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Recording Meetings

As others say, I'd caution on the recording aspect. However well done minutes should work for most situations.

If as Greg says you take notes as you go along, recap them - especially any actions & decisions - at the end of the meeting and then circulate them shortly after with request that anyone who doesn't agree lets you know within x time frame or similar that should work well.

Also means you've confirmed all points twice which reduces chance of misunderstandings.

Takes a little more effort than hitting record but imo gives more benefit too.

I rarely hold a meeting without sending minutes or at least confirmation email afterwards.



Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Recording Meetings

I'm pretty old-school, but when I am in Client meetings, even if I'm the Project Engineer or Project Manager and I have a bunch of folks with me who I *could* delegate the minute-taking to, I usually take minutes myself. What I have found works well for me is, within 24 hours of the meeting, I send a draft copy of the minutes to the Client for his/her "is what I wrote what you meant?" review. Upon receipt and incorporation of mutually-agreed comments, the minutes of the meeting are officially entered as a matter of record. This approach has never failed me.

And, just as I posted this, I now see KENAT has said the exact same thing before I could.

RE: Recording Meetings

I would third the idea of taking minutes. You're bound to get the salient points, condensed down, without the "ums" and crosstalk that a recording is going to have. People have accents, some have soft voices, there's a chance that depending on a recording might lull you into a false confidence.
Let's face it, a recording would be great, but if you take minutes plus get concurrence from the participants, that's pretty iron clad too.

RE: Recording Meetings

In the past I would have to take minutes at meetings, however, I don't write that fast, so I would put a pocket recorder in my jacket, everybody, "knew" ,I was ,"recording ", the meeting, when I got home, I would compare what I had written to what was said, then make corrections if needed, before I sent out the minutes.
This worked for me without any complaints.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Recording Meetings

This reminds me of something that I practiced for all of my working days. Beside my phone was a stenographer's note book. I kept notes of every phone call. Most never were used, but now and then they were very handy as in court to "refresh" the memory of someone had no recollection of the conversation. A few other instances came up where the written notes were very useful. Never had any objections.

RE: Recording Meetings

I've never recorded meetings, but I do record all my phone calls. I've only had to use them once in real anger to defend my position.

But in many cases it comes into its own regarding disputes about timing and something the Contractor said but was denying even if it's only to refresh you memory of events. It is enough to say to the Contractor 'I don't think that's correct, I'll have to go back through my call recordings and check' to get them to change their tune as they know that the game is up.

Moral of the story is that it's there as an important fall back if it's really required.

RE: Recording Meetings

In a project meeting, and I am referring to a construction project, a recorder in the middle of the table is a good tool to make sure the minutes are correct. These meetings typically don't involve lawyers, and I haven't had objections to the recorder.

RE: Recording Meetings

I had a coworker who recorded meetings 'because he could' (got a new toy for Christmas)and that only lasted one or two meetings since he quickly found out sitting through a meeting is bad enough but sitting through it twice to create minutes was worse than root canal. I can't see the value in having a recording without minutes since both parties could argue more was said after the recording stopped

RE: Recording Meetings

I tried using a solid state recorder in meetings for a while.
Actually, I tried tape recordings long before that, but they broke up the flow of the meeting and/or missed stuff during tape changes.
Just as truckandbus said, that meant I had to endure the meeting twice. ... at least.

Real Dictaphone(r) systems' transcription stations had special no-hands functions, including a footpedal to control the playback, playback at faster than real time speed (for fast typists), and auto-backspace that would back up a few seconds on restarting, so you could recall the preceding few words. Without features like that, transcription is a nightmare of moving your hands from recorder to keyboard and back.

It took me most of a day to transcribe a two hour meeting, so I decided it was not an efficient use of my time.
After that, I copied the audio file to a hard drive just in case of conflict,
but published a summary of my own notes as minutes.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Recording Meetings

On one especially long conference call, the client kept pursing a very specifically worded argument trying to get me to agree to some scope creep. I got bored answering the same question the same way, and to pass the time I decided to google the conference call service. One of the features on their website was automatic recording of all calls. Never trust a third party dial in service, and never trust a contractor who has a problem they think you should solve for them, for free (in other words, never trust a contractor.) If they had asked a few more times I might have said "sure, whatever" so I could have gone to lunch.

Then they snuck the answer they wanted me to give but never did, in the meeting minutes. I had to correct and return the minutes, which lead to another conference call... This was about 7 years ago so I don't recall the name of the service, but I'm sure there are plenty with recording features.

RE: Recording Meetings

Only once did I record a meeting. Since I knew that it was going to take several hours, and I would do a lot of speaking myself, I knew that I wouldn't be able to make comprehensive notes. Even so, I did take down some notes (in case the recording failed). The next day I summarized the meeting from my written notes and, as an experiment, didn't listen to the recording until after I had the minutes written to the best of my memory. Then I checked the recording, to see what I'd missed. Three hours later I had proven to myself that I really had been listening, and that recordings were mostly a waste of time. I circulated the minutes to the others that were at the meeting with no complaints or corrections.

I would also be concerned about making people ill at ease by recording them. It may not be that they have anything to hide or plan to change their mind - in fact it could be quite the opposite. The folks who want to build trust, see themselves as people who stick to their word, and prefer a handshake-deal instead of lawyers and contracts, are usually the best people to work with, but probably the most annoyed by recordings.

STF

RE: Recording Meetings

Studies have been done to compare students retention of a subject in class when taking notes by laptop vs writing them down with pen/pencil/paper.

Writing down with pen/pencil/paper resulted in a better retention rate.

(Note: the study was supposed to have been funded by a pencil manufacturer)

Like others above: Take meeting minutes and send out for approval from all parties. I've found that few actually have time to read the minutes, so at least keep a record that the minutes were sent. Better yet, have it signed by the correct parties for approval of minutes.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Recording Meetings

Seems we have a divide between structural engineers and others. In the absence of a court reporter as Ron suggested, for me the only option of assuring an accurate record of a meeting which I am chairing is to use a recorder. Chairing, minuting, refereeing, too much for me.

RE: Recording Meetings

As Mike says you have to re-endure the meeting. My wife who was a commercial magazine editor used to let me use her Dictaphone foot pedal controlled player .
But it was still a chore.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Recording Meetings

Great thread.

I have never recorded a meeting, but have had a few recorded, plus any work "on the record" (hearings, etc).

Simplest format for me is at the end of the meeting, verify what we touched on the agenda, read out everyone there's action items if they have any, and send the basic minutes afterwords for review/comment.

A well defined written agenda with whitespace for simple notes, and notebook for more complex stuff is my go-to method. At the bottom of the agenda I always have three columns "Action Item", "Who", "Due Date".

RE: Recording Meetings

(OP)
Thanks to everyone for the great input.....the real power of Engtips at it's best.

Our perspectives are obviously shaped by our experiences, and personally I feel that learning from someone's experience is just a way to improve myself.
The problem I have had, again based on my personal experience, with note taking is that you are not always aware of what the 'key' items are, combined with the fact that some clients are not going to respond to an email that says please tell me if my notes are not complete or are different than yours.

For instance, I had a meeting with client where we spoke about some attic truss feature that was not a highlight at the time. Turns out that after the trusses showed up, the truss web configuration was different than a concept model I had drawn for the meeting, 9 months earlier. The reason they were different is because they were designed by a truss manufacturer, not by me. In the meeting, I specifically said, "this configuration will change". Well for the clients wife, who couldn't speak construction lingo, this little line of verbage went in one ear and out the other. The truss package showed up and she couldn't fit her christmas lights in this attic as she had envisioned.

From that day on she wouldn't talk to me, and the owner went home every-night and heard what a fool I was from his wife. In every conversation with him from that point on it was obvious that he thought I had 'missed' it, so he had little confidence in anything else I did on the job. No matter how I tried to explain, reason, or point out what was said, they were dead set in what "I had told them", despite the fact that I had not told them what they remembered.

Your notes are only what you hear or feel is what is worth writing. A recorder catches every single word....including the ones you don't know are important at the time. Just my 2 cents based on my past experience.

RE: Recording Meetings

There are other records also. I work for a manufacturer and we photograph (is that the word for using electrons?) every box before we put the lid on it, and as it sits loaded on the truck.
Now many complaints end with 'here are the pictures....'

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Recording Meetings

I ordered ribs once from a take-out joint just outside of Atlanta and when I picked up the order they popped the top on the container to show me the ribs and then had me sign the container lid to acknowledge. They said they had too many people coming back saying the restaurant forgot to put the ribs in with the sides to get free ribs

RE: Recording Meetings

^ Sad commentary on society, but the need to protect oneself against rip-off artists is everywhere.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources