×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

(OP)
I appreciate that the finite element method (FEM) has considerable advantages over the finite difference method (FDM) when analysing 2D and 3D problems. However, for 1D beam-column problems I am not aware of any publications considering or comparing the differences between the methods.

What are the thoughts of engineers here regarding the two methods? Moreover, does one method produce more accurate results than the other method? If so, why?

My inclination is that FEM will provide more accurate results given the assumptions needed for FDM such as 'imaginary elements' for boundary conditions and use of the central difference theorem to determine slopes. That said, there are assumptions with FEM regarding shape functions, integration points, etc. but all of these seem to me to provide more accurate answers. Or am I just deluding myself with the illusion of complexity?

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

I would have to review a little bit, but I don't believe there would be much difference between FEM and FDM in 1D. A beam element is not much different than a difference in a beam.

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

Simple beam theory, ignoring shear deflections and second order effects, results in a cubic curve for deflections of a straight beam subject to a series of point loads (i.e. the shear force is uniform or stepped along the beam). Both FEA and FD will result in exactly the same cubic curve, if the beam is sub-divided at each applied load, and so will give exactly the same result.

I don't know how finite difference programs handle shear deflections, but in principle I don't see why they couldn't be handled with the same accuracy as in finite element programs.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

(OP)
Thanks for the answers.

I agree that in theory both methods could compute the same answer although FEM is probably more efficient at this computation than FDM. My primary concerns with FDM are the 'imaginary elements' needed for boundary conditions and also the use of the central difference theorem; you'd need a lot of elements to be truly accurate - I'd expect FEM to get closer to the true answer with relatively fewer elements. I wondered whether there are any publications to support this conclusion.

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

(OP)
Excuse my ignorance, but how does that relate to a comparison between FEM and FDM?

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

(without looking at the link) I suspect it says that FEA does a good job modelling beam columns.

I thought FDA was just a poor man's FEA ... it makes very similar assumptions about the structural response to load but typically has many fewer elements (ok, the only time I've seen FDA was a 25 grid model embedded in an excel s/sheet ... co-workers were impressed, I wasn't ... "that's like a 25 grid FEA for a structure several feet long, with integral stiffeners, and complex boundary conditions ..."); so it isn't a hard limit of FDA.

in these days over extremely cheap FEA, why use FDA ?

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

Quote:

Excuse my ignorance, but how does that relate to a comparison between FEM and FDM?

It calculates the shear forces, moments and deflections in a continuous beam by fitting deflections to a cubic spline. The cubic spline formulation uses a numerical method to calculate slope and curvature at the end of each segment, which is the same process used in finite difference analysis.

It then compares the results to those from a finite element program (Strand7), and finds that the results are identical, within machine accuracy.

That is to be expected because beam elements in FEA programs work much the same way, except that mathematical method is more computationally expensive for a beam with many elements.

Referring back to your original post, the "imaginary elements" in finite difference analysis are simply a way of specifying the curvature and/or slope at the ends of a beam, and the central difference theorem gives "exact" results for a cubic curve, so neither will affect the accuracy of the results.

As for reasons for using the finite difference method, for small beam problems there probably is no real advantage, other than the interest in finding that a standard cubic spline formulation can be used to exactly match results from standard beam theory, but for large and complex non-linear problems I believe it can be quicker than FEA, but I have never used it myself in that context.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Finite difference and finite element analysis of beam-columns

(OP)
Thanks for the explanations. That makes sense now.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources