×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

short circuit capacity of MCB

short circuit capacity of MCB

short circuit capacity of MCB

(OP)
how to choose a MCB from 3kA, 4.5kA MCB, 6kA MCB and 10kA MCB for domestic application? i have seen 10kA MCB are used for industrial applications. but why industrial applications need 10kA MCB instead of 3kA, 4.5kA MCB, 6kA MCB

what is the thumb rule of selecting short circuit capacity of a MCB.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Normally the industrial system has stronger source with higher capacity transformers and concentrated loads. Hence, higher kA MCBs are required.

I heard that even higher rated (may be 21kA) MCBs are being used in some places. So the distinction is obvious.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

(OP)
could u pls give me more information for the reason why we need higher kA rated MCB for industrial?

is there any technical reference guide from that i can get a more clearer idea abt this?

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

The MCB should be selected so that its KA rating is at least equal, and preferably higher than the (calculated or measured) prospective short-circuit fault current (PSSC) of the supply.
Industrial installations tend to have power supplies with high PSSC, hence the need for higher-rated circuit breakers. Not so with residential supply networks which often have a PSSC of 2KA or less.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

The kA rating of the mcb needs to be greater than the available short circuit current at the location the breaker is installed. What is the size of the transformer and voltage for the circuit you are looking at? The maximum available fault current would be the transformer full load amps divided by the transformer impedance. Of course that would be right at the transformer terminals and ignores the impedance of the conductors to the panel.

This is why in industrial facilities the main breaker and main panel breakers may be rated at 42kA and then as you farther downstream the rating of the breakers can decrease to 25 or 22kA.

Typically the lowest rated mcb's I see are 10kA with an occasional 5kA. For a residential service fed by a 25kVA transformer 120/240V, the fault current is around 7kA, so typically the panels and breakers are 10kA rated.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

(OP)
how can i calculate and get the fault current value as 7kA for a 25kVA transformer?

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Doesn't earth fault loop impedance and perspective fault current testing decide?

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Quote (OP)

how can i calculate and get the fault current value as 7kA for a 25kVA transformer?
Knowing the voltage is a big help. Actually knowing the voltage is almost mandatory.
ARE YOU SURE THAT YOU SHOULD BE DOING THIS?

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

This strikes me as one of those cases where if you have to ask...

Please find the assistance of someone locally who understands the local requirements. To me the consideration of anything less than 10kA can only be done if one's cranium is in a location where the sun don't shine.

Sorry, but it sounds like you're in over your head in an area where there's no room for trial and error.

Infinite bus on the high-side and you're looking at more than 13kA. Why are you questioning 7kA?

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

The above reply is offensive and was uncalled for. In the IEC world selecting an interrupting rating less than 10ka is done all the time and is actually a very intelligent question. Given enough distance and right wire size perspective fault current under 10ka is very possible even for an industrial application. I do not believe the OP is closed minded to any degree. Googling earth fault loop impedance and perspective fault current is a good place to start.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Maybe it's one of those IEEE/ANSI vs. IEC things then. In the IEEE/ANSI world there's essentially nothing less than 10kA for installation in a panelboard. There are DIN rail mountable supplemental overcurrent devices for use in control panels that might have lower ratings (and some much older devices with no labelled rating that have to be assumed as being 5kA). I'm very surprised that any manufacturer would go to lengths of having four different devices of the same nominal rating with different interrupting ratings all less than or equal to 10kA; seems like a spare parts nightmare. But if they really do, good for them. Around here the utilities will go to great lengths (including extra lengths of secondary conductor) to keep single family residential services to less than 10kA, but you'll never get any other number from the utility; thus 10kA it is. Multifamily may go higher, next step is generally 22kA.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Not often we see less than 6kA MCBs these days, and 10kA is normally offered when industrial manufacturers re-badge their mainline products for the domestic market. There are still retrofit types designed to repace rewireable fuselinks which are only good for 3kA, and some of the really early MCBs have only 1kA or 2kA breaking capacity as I found out fairly recently on an old panelboard made by Crabtree in the UK. That panelboard is getting changed ASAP.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

MCBs for the European and Asian markets come in a variety of interpreting ratings less than and well over 10ka. TT earthed supplies greatly reduce fault current, and in any domestic installation you are required to test and know the loop impedance coming from the DNO (POCO). Each breaker also has its own magnetic trip threshold (B, C, D, ect) curves and short circuit ratings are listed as Icu and Ics rather than one fixed listing:

http://www.electriciansforums.co.uk/electrical-for...


If a domestic supply has a fault current less than 10ka it does not make sense installing an MCB (miniature circuit breaker) of a higher interrupting capacity. Manufactures go to the length of having different devices for various technical reasons as having a one size fits all creates far bigger nightmares than potential inventory logistics. For example, the high magnetic trip thresholds of North American circuit breakers designed to cover all possible scenarios have been blamed for many fires and are the reason why arc fault circuit interrupters were mandated by the National Electrical Code NFPA70:



http://paceforensic.com/pdfs/Circuit_Breakers_The_...

http://paceforensic.com/pdfs/newsletter/KeepingPac...

http://paceforensic.com/pdfs/newsletter/KeepingPac...

http://paceforensic.com/pdfs/newsletter/KeepingPac...

The above findings have been confirmed by UL and presented to the NEC code making panels:

http://www.ul.com/global/documents/library/white_p...

http://newscience.ul.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/0...

http://newscience.ul.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/0...


The theory is that while a single magnetic trip level can cover all loads, the impedance of a short circuit itself along with the none sinusoidal current draw (low RMS current) from sporadic sputtering results in increased incident energy at a fault when relying on thermal trip instead of magnetic trip because thermal trip relies on a accumulated heating (inverse time) rather than an instantaneous (immediate) effect. A waveform may have 150amps peak, but with parts of the sign wave missing the current will "appear" much lower to the bimetal. In the IEC this is where various time current curves and magnetic pickups come in. A circuit breaker is selected for the inrush of the load and then the installer must make sure the loop impedance is low enough by selecting the right wire size to meet the specified disconnect times in IEC60364 or as Im thinking BS7671. Here is a paper regarding disconnect times and the various MCBs/conductor impedance in meeting them:

http://espm.co.uk/Max%20Zs%20tables%2017th%20Ed.pd...


I apologies this is not the best paper, but typical MCBs for a domestic consumer unit:


https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Technical/DataSheets/...


In terms of perspective fault current here is how the test is carried out:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOyLsi1GFqg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-v9LcuTQNM


RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

And oh, page 16 (actual number, not the viewer) of a Crabtree (UK) industrial catalog showing both 6ka and 10ka breakers
(3ka is also mentioned being available):


http://www.coronabd.com/download/Crabtree-Industri...


Remember that IEC breakers are rated differently in terms of short circuit interpreting capability so that may also play a role. But the point I am trying to make is professional electricians and engineers install circuit breakers below 10ka every day outside of North America even in industrial and commercial properties while still being to code.


RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

In North America a typical residential breaker may have a rating of 15 Amperes. The instantaneous trip level may be 10 times this or 150 Amps. This will be the same whether the breaker has an interrupting rating of 5 kA, 10 kA or 22 kA.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

What waross said. Trip characteristics and interrupting ratings are independent of each other in any breaker I'm familiar with. If a 10kA breaker is adequate and I install a 22kA (in the same family) instead I've only spent a bit more money, but I haven't changed the trip characteristics at all.

The arc fault breakers add electronics to detect the signature of the arcing fault, but the thermal and magnetic tripping characteristics remain essentially the same.

On the other hand, if the interrupting rating affects the trip characteristics then it probably does make sense to try to optimize the selection and have lots of options. Where it doesn't then high enough is good enough and it doesn't make much sense to deal with lots of options.

Sounds like another one of those areas where both sides of the ANSI/IEC divide find what's done on the other side to be completely weird. Somehow the same physics results in very different engineering.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

David / Bill,

Over here we have three trip classes for MCBs: B, C, and D respectively corresponding to the magnetic element operating at 5x, 10x and 20x the rated current of the breaker. This has no relationship to the breaking capability of the MCB. The low breaking capacity MCBs are confined to domestic and small light commercial installations where the marginally lower cost proves attractive to the cut-throat world of domestic and light commerical installations. As networks are reinforced and larger transformers appear on the system the domestic fault levels are tending to rise, although in almost all cases they are ultimately backed up by an HRC service fuse provided by the utility.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

I never said magnetic pickup determines interrupting rating or visa versa. It does not and they are sepeprate. Rather I was giving an example of why manufactures stock different versions of the same thing. I am very well aware of North American trip curves considering I have read those documents posted.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Quote (davidbeach)

What waross said. Trip characteristics and interrupting ratings are independent of each other in any breaker I'm familiar with. If a 10kA breaker is adequate and I install a 22kA (in the same family) instead I've only spent a bit more money, but I haven't changed the trip characteristics at all.

I know :) A 10ka, 22, 65ka all have the same tripping characteristic. But you said the same thing as I did, a 22ka breaker costs more than a 10ka breaker. So if you have a large number of consumer units where the typical fault current is say 5ka it makes sense for manufactures to stock a cheaper 6ka in addition to 10ka instead of only 10ka or say only 16ka and cover everything. Yes its less logistics, but more cost to the customer.


Quote:

The arc fault breakers add electronics to detect the signature of the arcing fault, but the thermal and magnetic tripping characteristics remain essentially the same.

Correct, however (AIC aside) the magnetic trip component has gone down over the years in single pole 120 volt residential breakers, but you can only go do down so far, hence the electronics found in AFCIs. In the early days of AFCI development the idea was to simply have a standard thermal magnetic breaker with a known magnetic trip level of 75amps. 75amps was chosen as being the lowest anticipated level of fault current in a dwelling (500amps available fault current at the panel plus a long circuit length, say 150 feet). While such a breaker would provide parallel arc fault protection, it would nuisance trip on motor and tungsten inrush. Thus, a solution was created where instead to relying on a coil at 75amps, electronics would monitor the current waveform starting at 75amps. Thus, discrimination could be achieved. A motor starting with a 120 amp inrush would not trip because the waveform is mostly sinusoidal, but if someone drove a nail into NM, the electronics would see the sporadic/distorted sine wave and trip mimicking the advantage of a low magnetic trip breaker.


Of course 15 years latter AFCI were required to also look for series arc faults which has nothing to do with parallel arc faults (whole other ball game), but it gives you the the idea behind the history.

Similar philosophy in the IEC, however its up to the electrician to select the right pickup and then make sure the system can pass the required current to trip the breaker magnetically.



Quote:

Sounds like another one of those areas where both sides of the ANSI/IEC divide find what's done on the other side to be completely weird. Somehow the same physics results in very different engineering.


Well, also keep in mind whats at play. 230 volts has more hazards and is less forging than 120 volts, so it does play a role in the design.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Going way out on a limb here, but my guess is that if you look at manufacturer A who makes 3, 4.5, 6, and 10kA breakers and manufacturer B who only makes a 10kA breaker that manufacturer A's 10kA breaker is going to be more expensive than manufacturer B's 10kA breaker. A's 3 or 4.5 will probably be less than B's 10, but the cost of making multiple versions will push all of A's costs up.

I've seen, and continue to deal with, the results of people optimizing designs in the past to use just the bare minimum; in fact we paid contractors bonuses 20+ years ago to spend as little as possible on as tight a design as possible. The added O&M costs since then probably exceeded the first cost savings within a few years and we keep paying and paying. Useful projects get put off simply because a $10k project will require many times that in infrastructure upgrades simply to make the necessary space available.

If you're designing a manufactured product that's going to be produced thousands or millions of times then by all means make it as cost efficient as possible, optimize the heck out of it. Particularly if you aren't going to be responsible for ongoing maintenance of it. But if you're building something for the ages, the guys/gals that come after you to maintain it will curse your name for years to come if you optimize it to the nth degree and leave no wiggle room.

If you can use a 6kA today because you calculate 5.8kA and then the utility upgrades their system and then the value calculates out to 6.1kA, how much have you saved in the long run by installing 6kA breakers instead of 10kA? Not going to happen you say, the utility won't need to make that change; well something will change. Maybe the laws will change and indoor grow operations for personal medical or recreational use will become legal and the neighborhood power consumption goes up by 50% and the transformers all become overloaded and get replaced with larger transformers. Things happen and overly optimized designs become obsolete much quicker.

Having too many times come after the guy that picked just the "right" size/rating/layout over the years, I get a bit testy; "oh, not again". The original question, and some of the follow ups, remind me of the design "logic" that ended up with a single section 600A MCC (lowest vertical bus rating is 600A) with two size 1 starters and a 60A feed to the MCC. The other four cells in the MCC were forever useless because that 60A feed couldn't carry anything else. The owner then paid much more to get a couple of motors added than they would have if the feed to the MCC had been 200A originally. But 60A was a lower first cost. Bah.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

I agree, an excellent perspective (especially on cost being driven up on the high end to save on the low end), but the same could be said about the US. What happens when tankless heaters become all the rage? Soon that 25kva pole pig needs to be upgraded to 75kva and the LV secondaries following. Granted most residential service drops fed from typical over head lines do no come near 10ka so there is a margin that can be taken advantage of, but still in some places those 10ka breakers will become obsolete as well. Also keep in mind that a 5ka 240 volt breaker is about the same as a 10ka 240 volt breaker in extremely simplified terms. The voltage may be double, but the current will be half during a short circuit on 240/416Y transformer when compared to a 120/208Y of same impedance and source impedance.

This is a really handy paper imo:


http://www.alabamapower.com/business/services/arch...

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

The SC at the transformer bushing is significant damped by the LV service entrance feeder impedance. The standard practice of utility in the US is not to oversize distribution transformers for economic reason. Therefore, exceeding the SC in the US residential service at the interconnecting point it is an unusual event.
The majority of the residential services are single phase (split-phase) 120/240 volt system. The 240 V secondary winding is center-tapped and the center neutral wire grounded. Most service transformers are pole mounted a less quantity are pad mounted unit.
See below a typical SC damping effect on the service entrance feeder.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

IS the wire shown CU or AL? My apologies.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

The author used Cu to develop the graphic above.
Below is another approximate curve for a single phase residential service 120-240 Volts based in 25kVA & 50 kVA with 1.4% and 1.8% impedances respectively.
The SC provided by pole mounted transformers is usually lower for the same kVA capacity since those transformers have larger impedances than the pad mounted units.


RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

CORRECTION: The solid lines on the graphic above are for copper conductors.

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Thank you! This graph is worthy of a "sticky" :)

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

Cucky, have you tried the new edit feature?
You may be able to correct the graph.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

(OP)


can someone clarify why short circuit current rating getting decreased like this?

RE: short circuit capacity of MCB

At the transformer the transformer impedance limits the fault current.
At the service the impedance of the service conductors plus the transformer impedance limits the fault current.
At the branch panel the impedance of the branch circuit conductors plus the impedance of the service conductors plus the transformer impedance limits the fault current.
etc.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources