×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lateral Stability Ratio

Lateral Stability Ratio

Lateral Stability Ratio

(OP)
Hello All,

I am currently working on a design of a simple monorail system. Some of my old mentors spreadsheets has a "Lateral Stability Ratio" which can not exceed 40. The equation is the length of the beam divided by the width of the beam. Does this sound familiar to anyone? If so, could you please point me in the right direction to find where something like that is stated?

Regards,
jheydon2

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

Doesn't ring any bells with me (doesn't sound like a proper slenderness ratio check either). Of course, with hung monorail systems, the challenge is deciding on unbraced length. If you do a search, you will see a lot of threads on that topic.

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

jheydon2 - Your mentors must have been around a long time. The "Lateral Stability Ratio" dates back to the 1930's, and before. That is how what is now called "lateral-torsional buckling" was addressed... before it was well understood. Using that the beam length to flange width ratio is obsolete (and not always accurate, anyway).

Go to this page of my website and download the Carnegie Pocket Companion - 1934, located near the top of the page. See the portion of the book "Safe Loads For Sections Used as Beams" beginning on page 182. The 40:1 ratio is addressed on page 184.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

If I had to guess:

1) A poor man's check on lateral torsional buckling (LTB) or;

2) A poor man's check on lateral stiffness although I wouldn't technically call that stability.

Is there a separate LTB check built into the spreadsheet?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

Damn it! Typed too slow... Nicely done SRE.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

The unbraced length-to-width ratio of the compression flange in hot-rolled beams, plate girders, and built-up girders was limited to 40 in the first through fourth editions of the AISC Specification. The units for both "l" and "b" were inches. As best I can tell, the provision was not included in the 5th edition AISC Steel Construction Manual. As Kootk said, I would term this a poor man's version of a check for lateral-torsional buckling. Out of curiosity, how old are your mentors?? :)

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

(OP)
Thanks for the responses. My mentor is around 72 now, so not quite sure where he got it. Could anyone point me in the direction to check the lateral torsional buckling properly?

RE: Lateral Stability Ratio

You can find one treatment of LTB in chapter F of the AISC Specification here: https://www.aisc.org/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=...

As WARrose alluded though, if this is a hung monorail, the trick will be defining the unbraced length between points of torsional support. That's a problem that hasn't really had a codified solution (as far as I'm aware).

I'd recommend reading this thread for sure: http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=387114
There are also a handful of threads about suspended beams here on eng-tips if you want to get into a lot of depth.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources