INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Power Supply Not complying with the new DOE Level VI Performance Requirements

Power Supply Not complying with the new DOE Level VI Performance Requirements

(OP)
I'm working on a VERY custom 120VAC to 5VDC power supply and I've looked over the new DOE efficiency standards and I've noticed that they have changed the Max power in the No Load mode to 100mW for my power output. Given the complex design of the power supply I do not think that I can meet this condition at this time. What are the repercussions of not meeting the DOE efficiency standards? I would still like to get this power adapter UL certified so I'm hoping this won't be a problem there either. Any insight would be helpful!

RE: Power Supply Not complying with the new DOE Level VI Performance Requirements

If there is a big difference between the running power demand and the 'powered-down' demand then the typical solution is a second power supply. One that supplies just enough power to detect a "power up" signal from the large supply's consumer. Or possibly you can use the second one to 'blindly' keep the output stage fully charged providing the main supply some time to come on-line.

You realize there are 1 and 1/2W isolated supplies that have 5kV isolation and come in SMD footprints?

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Power Supply Not complying with the new DOE Level VI Performance Requirements

EEMan, Interesting post. Thanks for the heads up. I just looked up the new 2016 DOE requirements. Yikes. The 100mW which you mentioned is 200mW less than the old 300mW standard. That in itself required everyone to redesign input stage filters. Let's see: 0.2 W savings x 24 hrs x 365 days = 1.73kWh saved per year. Multiply that by an average of 15 cents/kWh and we get 26 cents savings per year. This seems totally negligible to me.
Will the cost of each wall-wart go up by more than 26 cents to get the extra circuitry in there?
Did the government get input from major suppliers of such devices for their opinion as to what this extra cost will be?

Darrell Hambley P.E.
SENTEK Engineering, LLC

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close