×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Simplified analysis for connections

Simplified analysis for connections

Simplified analysis for connections

(OP)
In my work, I am frequently faced with the problem of transferring loads from larger structures to connections. It is not always easy to determine how a loaded element will transfer its load to an adjacent connection.Also, the standard "stick modelling" approach taught in most universities (based on Euler Bernoulli bbeam theory and the general stiffness method) really doesnt apply to connections. Does there exist any literature on the subject of load transfer and distribution to connections? I am specifically looking for simplified procedures that structural engineers can use in a non-academic context to quickly determine loading on bolts, screws, welds etc, without resorting to finite elements. Something one can do by hand or spreadsheet...

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

I think a sketch or an example of what specifically you are looking for, would be quite helpful.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

pick up a few books by Omar Blodgett and study them.....

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

(OP)
Omer Blodgett's book on welds is excellent, but he has little, if any, work on bolted connections, which are my main concern.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

Tamboli: Link
Salmon & Jonhson: Link
AISC Design Guide 17: Link
Kulak (free): Link
RCSC (free): Link
AISC Design Guide 29: Link

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

(OP)
Kootk, thanks for the suggestions. I'm looking for something more on the analysis rather than design side... Something agnostic to the type (Steel or otherwise) connection. I'm looking for a general theory on how to translate boundary/loading conditions on elements to local stress distributions on connections...

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

Quote (awa)

I'm looking for something more on the analysis rather than design side..

Me no understando. For typical connections and loads, the design and analysis processes are essentially inseparable.

Quote (quote awa)

Something agnostic to the type (Steel or otherwise) connection.

Agnostic... I like that. Unfortunately, there's no such thing. Connection load distribution is very dependent on the parent material (steel, concrete, wood, chewing gum).

Quote (awa)

I'm looking for a general theory on how to translate boundary/loading conditions on elements to local stress distributions on connections..

For the love of all that that is agnostically holy man, follow Badger's advice and give us a sketch/example to work to.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

The answer is to satisfy the equations of:
1. Equilibrium
2. Compatibility
3. Constitutive relation

tongue

"It is imperative Cunth doesn't get his hands on those codes."

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

(OP)
MacGruber... That sounds like FEM to me... is there a simplified FEM procedure for connections?

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

For specific cases (e.g. a shear tab connection, or corbel bracket), sure, you can develop some strain compatibility procedures that will act a lot like FEM without being FEM "proper".

Generally? No. Not that I've heard of at least.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

I have a spreadsheet.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

You might get some satisfaction looking into the "Component Method" that seems to be emerging out of Europe. Here's an example for base plate connections: Link. Two caveats:

1) It's steel very much material specific and;
2) Personally, I'm not yet sold on it.

The best statements of connection design philosophy that I've encountered come from the Tamboli book that I mentioned above. I've posted those below. Even this stuff only really applies to ductile materials however. It works for steel, aluminum, and concrete (usually). It would not necessarily work for wood, cast iron, or glass.

Looking at MacGruber's list:

Quote (MacGruber)

1. Equilibrium
2. Compatibility
3. Constitutive relation

For routine connection design, I would change that to:

1) Equilibrium fo' sure.
2) Some rough accounting of the relative stiffness of things.
3) Some provision for ductility if there's any to be had.

Compatibility and constitutive relations get a pretty rough treatment, if any, in the design of most connections.




I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

(OP)
Lomarandil: Im interested in these strain compatibility procedures. Also, Buggar, do you mind sharing it or at least the reference documents you used to develop it?

Thanks guys

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

There´s an italian software for the design of connections (Castalia CSE) that may what you're looking for. I haven't tested it yet but it seems that it is basically an environment for the creation of full 3D FEM models of the connections.

Here's the link:
http://www.steelchecks.com/connections/home.asp#.V...

RE: Simplified analysis for connections

Following on from KootK's comment regarding the component method.

Link below to software developed on the back of that theory/method. I believe it's the same guys who came up with the method in the first place.

Link

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources