×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

(OP)
A client wishes to use RTJ on CL900 systems in both 304SS and 316SS. The gaskets are to match the metallurgy of the line, so I've got two 304SS flanges squeezing a 304SS gasket. Ditto for 316.

My concerns are...
Will this situation produce a satisfactory seal at reasonable bolt loadings?
Will the flange continue to function if the joint has to be broken and remade with new gaskets?

304SS and 316SS ring gaskets apparently are available at a max hardness of Rockwell-B 83 or Brinnell 160. (http://www.sealing.com/fileadmin/docs/Ring_Joint_H...)

ASTM A182 does not directly control hardness on F304 or F316. ASME B16.5 is no help on hardness either.

My limited understanding of gasket sealing is that the soft gasket should plastically deform to meet the hard, rigid flange which only deforms elastically. So in this case it seems that the plastic deformation may be shared between the gasket and the flanges.

Anyone have other recommendations for the situation? The 304SS line is operating at -200F and the 316SS is in corrosive services (rich amines, condensing H2S, condensing H2CO3).

RE: Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

I'm with you on this one - the ring should deform not the flange surface. B16.5 though then refers to B16.20, which I don't have a copy of. What does that say?

I have seen it in piping specs that hardness needs to be a certain number below the flanges, but can't recall by how much.

Probably best to find a technical agent in your ring supplier and get their advice. They've seen it many more times than you or I.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

Previous Project had 18/8 Stainless Steel RTJ gasket as a maximum brinell hardness of 135 with ring hardness being a minimum of 15 HB less than flange hardness.

RE: Stainless RTJ w/ Stainless Gasket - Relative Hardness

I'm with MickMc and LittleInch. I have had "superiors" in the past - both on the EPC side and on the Producer (Client) side - who would get irritated with me and tell me, "It doesn't matter.". They even wanted me to write it *out* of the Specifications, a request I have always ignored. I always ask for 20 HB or more softer in the gasket than the flange. If it takes Procurement a bit longer to find it from suppliers because "the spec is tight", well, so be it. I also think MickMc's recommendation for materials in this instance is reasonable.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources