INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Examples of alternates vs dash configuration

Examples of alternates vs dash configuration

(OP)
Due to the desire to work around a poor change process, that I am tasked to improve, I am facing a battle with modularity/alternates and others.

For some reason, there is a desire in this new organization to reduce part numbers. They seem cheap to me. There is also a desire to create a drawing for every part. I think that is a legacy due to poor CM software contraints.

That's the background here.

I am in favor of tabulated drawings, dash part numbers, to reduce the amount of drawings and maximize configurations. I'll let PLM management figure out when to retire part numbers. The organization has a poor understanding of interchangeable and FFF.

Where do you put a line in the sand with the use of alternates vs pulling out a new dash configuration or model/drawing?

To me an alternate, would be an identical part with additional screening or due to end of life (lead vs lead free component) I also would never specify alternates at the top level assy drawing delivered to the customer. ASME states alternates to be FFF equivalent; for all past, current, future applications.

RE: Examples of alternates vs dash configuration

Take a look at Y14.100 section 6.8 (at least in the 2004 version I have) it details 'Change Requiring New Identification) - best way to summarize it is full interchangeability.

Not just physical interchangeability but even things like Traceability such as if the plating changed to be 'lead free' or 'Hex Chrome' free then this might need a new part number so you could tell compliant part from older non compliant part.

A 'dash number' is still a different part number, even though the drawing is the same ID - as you are probably well aware.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Examples of alternates vs dash configuration

Quote (jshayy)



...

Where do you put a line in the sand with the use of alternates vs pulling out a new dash configuration or model/drawing?

This is not a software problem. I cannot see why configuration management should have problems with tabulated drawings. The drawings and CAD models are files that are checked out and updated, and that have version (revision) numbers. The content of the drawings is an issue for engineering and your MRP/ERP.

How do the office politics work at your company, and how much authority do you have?

--
JHG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close