×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Steel Column Encased in Concrete

(OP)
Yet another Friday morning question...

If you take a steel column (W12x87), 22ft tall and encase it in 24" of concrete, up the entire length of the column, does this change the unbraced length?

I'm leaning towards "No", but just wanted to get some feedback.

Thanks!

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

(This is just gut feel, I haven't designed one myself to know the specifics of the code)

It wouldn't change the unbraced length for axial, but I would certainly consider an increase in the radius of gyration.

If it's a beam-column, I'd also presume that LTB or FLB effects are prevented by the concrete.

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

short ans...no

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Short answer; maybe. Though it would take so much work to prove it that I wouldn't consider it worth it to consider the concrete (especially for a relatively long column).

Professional and Structural Engineer (ME, NH, MA)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

I would treat it as a composite column that is unbraced. New section and material properties will improve its capacity but bracing is different than "bigger section".

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Quote (JNEnginr)

If you take a steel column (W12x87), 22ft tall and encase it in 24" of concrete, up the entire length of the column, does this change the unbraced length?

It's a matter of perspective. I'm going to assume that you're working on strengthening an existing column. I'm also going to assume that we're dealing with axial loads for the sake of simplicity. If we need to get fancier, let us know.

There are two fundamentally different approaches that one can take:

1) The steel and concrete act compositely and that combined section buckles in a half sine wave over the entire height of the physical column. The new composite column has a higher radius of gyration but an unchanged kL as Lomariandil mentioned.

2) The steel and concrete do not act compositely. As the designer, you decide on where you'd like to see the steel column braced and establish your bracing strength and stiffness requirements (AISC appendices in the US). Next you design the concrete column, acting on its own, to satisfy those bracing strength and stiffness requirements. In this sense, the concrete column can most definitely alter the effective length of the steel column. See the sketch below for an illustration of this concept.

Within these two general approaches, I know of a few ways to approach the computations to expedite the design. Let us know if that's something that you're interested in pursing.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

(OP)
Hey! Sorry, I didn't get any notifications until yesterday for some reason. Thank you for all your responses.

My intent is not to reinforce the column...not yet anyway. I have an existing building and I'm checking the max capacity of the 2nd floor structure. Axial only. Currently the columns are the controlling element, but I'm calc'ing them as completely unbraced. In the field, they are currently encased in concrete, so i have no way of determining if there were any welded studs or any other formal connection.

Would you agree in my choice to just ignore the concrete and treat the column as unbraced?

Thanks,

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Quote (JNEnginr)

Would you agree in my choice to just ignore the concrete and treat the column as unbraced?

I would agree. In many cases with older buildings the "concrete" is really just fire protection. Limited thickness; unreinforced or nominally reinforced; low density. In summary, tough to do much with structurally.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

(OP)
Great, thanks as always.

RE: Steel Column Encased in Concrete

Quote (Lomarandil)

It wouldn't change the unbraced length for axial, but I would certainly consider an increase in the radius of gyration.

If it's a beam-column, I'd also presume that LTB or FLB effects are prevented by the concrete.

Lomarandill has it exactly right; the KL stays the same, but your r increases substantially, which for axial loads has the same effect as reducing L. This is of course assuming that the column and concrete are made sufficiently composite.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources