×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Theory vs FE - Internal Energy of Solid Cylinder in Pure Axial Compression

Theory vs FE - Internal Energy of Solid Cylinder in Pure Axial Compression

Theory vs FE - Internal Energy of Solid Cylinder in Pure Axial Compression

(OP)
Hi there,

I am having a bit of a conundrum here with Abaqus.

As I understand it, when doing internal energy calculations, the energy of the FE solution should go higher as the number of elements in some geometry increases. As would be expected this continues to a point. Also, the energy as calculated using FE should be in theory lower than that calculated using analytical expressions for the same geometry, as we have discretized the domain and the stiffness of individual elements is higher than that of a solid continuum.

I am trying to find the internal energy stored in a solid cylinder loaded in axial compression. I have an analytical expression for this energy, but the analytical expression is calculating a LOWER energy than what I am finding using Abaqus (I would think it should be the opposite). The loading condition is purely axial.

I have double and triple checked that the material properties and geometry are the same between the FE simulation and the analytical calculations.

Do I have the comparison between the theory and FE simulations right? Or am I completely missing something here?

RE: Theory vs FE - Internal Energy of Solid Cylinder in Pure Axial Compression

"..when doing internal energy calculations, the energy of the FE solution should go higher as the number of elements in some geometry increases."

If the FE model is set-up correctly, not at all! Internal energy comes from the deformation (i.e., change in the kinematic state) of the domain (in a structural analysis). Indeed, beyond a certain number of elements, the energy must converge (unless singularities are present).

" energy as calculated using FE should be in theory lower than that calculated using analytical expressions for the same geometry, as we have discretized the domain and the stiffness of individual elements is higher than that of a solid continuum."

It depends on the element formulation.

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources