Case Hardening trouble
Case Hardening trouble
(OP)
Hello all!
Im an intern at a heat treatment facility as a mechanical engineer. (non english speaking so sorry for typo-o's :)
I have a task which is causing alot of trouble in our case hardening department.
A costumer is producing different sizes axels in 20MnCr5.
When one certan size axel is treatet they simply dont get any carbon addition in the surface. The other parts in the oven at the same time have perfect result, but this particular axel doesnt.
I have tried to measurre hardness to see if there is any difference after treatment, but no change.
I got my hands on a piece of their raw material before they machined it, and tried to treat that part with great succes. It had the desired case.
So im thinking there is something in the machining of that particular size axel that leaves a protective "shell" so it wont be treated.
Does anyone have any suggestions or experience with similar problems ?
/Kenneth
Im an intern at a heat treatment facility as a mechanical engineer. (non english speaking so sorry for typo-o's :)
I have a task which is causing alot of trouble in our case hardening department.
A costumer is producing different sizes axels in 20MnCr5.
When one certan size axel is treatet they simply dont get any carbon addition in the surface. The other parts in the oven at the same time have perfect result, but this particular axel doesnt.
I have tried to measurre hardness to see if there is any difference after treatment, but no change.
I got my hands on a piece of their raw material before they machined it, and tried to treat that part with great succes. It had the desired case.
So im thinking there is something in the machining of that particular size axel that leaves a protective "shell" so it wont be treated.
Does anyone have any suggestions or experience with similar problems ?
/Kenneth





RE: Case Hardening trouble
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion"]
o Learn the rules like a pro, so you can b
RE: Case Hardening trouble
AISI 5120 please.
"Even,if you are a minority of one, truth is the truth."
Mahatma Gandhi.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Can you please explain ?
Im familiar with oxides, but i cant see how the oxide only appears after machining, and especially on certain diameter axel.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
I have done a spectra analysis and it is AISI 5120.
I will try and see if our costumer will supply a machined part we can try it on.
But im still confused why its not happening to the other diameter parts in the same material.
Im thinking it must be the machining of that particular diameter that is causing trouble since we can carburize their other parts and we can carburize the raw un machined material.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
It might be related to the surface finish.
Usually treating in an air draw at 700-1000° to develop an oxide layer prior to the carburizing process will cause the part to respond normally. I'm not sure if it is because the oxidation changes the surface finish, the temperature "burns off" some contaminant on the part, or if there's something about the iron oxide layer itself that helps.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Maui
RE: Case Hardening trouble
I hate to be picky...
OK you are making the parts from AISI 5120 steel...
What is the 5120 steel bar material spec [IE: ASTM Axxx, AMSxxxx, etc]?
What is the core alloy heat treated to [EX: 180-KSI, etc]; and what is the heat treat specification You are performing the HT work per [EX: MIL-H-6875, AMS2759/7, etc]?
What is the Carburizing specification You are performing the carburizing to [EX: ASTM A534, AMS2762, AMS-S-6090, AMS2759/12, etc]
BTW... mfgenggear hit the nail on the head... 5120 is NOT an alloy steel that is normally carburized... that may be a big part of Your problem.
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion"]
o Learn the rules like a pro, so you can b
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Maui
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion"]
o Learn the rules like a pro, so you can b
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
@Maui. Exactly what im thinking. I cant help to think that there must be difference in the way they machine the axels since their smaller ones in the same material in same batch are fine. About the cleaning, yes we clean all the parts good before carburizing.
Unfortuneally the costumer is stubborn and is not so open around how they do things.
But I was hopeing someone had issues with machining before say, “hey this is deffently a potential cause”
@Wktaylor. As said im an intern with no special heat treatment education. Just a “regular” mechanical engineer, so the specs you are referring to doesn’t ring a bell yet. I will look into them. And to be clear I am not making the parts, just treating them
As said I did a sprectra analasis. If you want I can get the complete material composition listed if it help anything.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Maui
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
don't throw stones until you have checked and double check you own stuff.
it has been very rare that our parts can not get the correct case depth and hardness.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
@Swall. awesome! i was hopeing someone had this issue before, we just have to push through to our costumer and hope they will let us in on their procedures to see if they are using different coolants or machining techniques.
@Mfgenggear. But how do you handle tight tolerances if you in house blast the part ? wouldnt it be better to have the costumer change the coolant/machining, if this is the case, to the same coolant/machining as they use on their smaller axels ? I will talk to my supervisor to see if we can allow to try and etch and blast on one axel next time we get them in house, it sounds like the best option for now. The reason why we never thought of blasting is, that it has never been an issue we have seen here before.
And Thanks for all the replies by the way :) !
RE: Case Hardening trouble
But like we suspected they wont let us in on what difference.
The case is closed until we recieve their next shipment. If we meet the same problem again i will convince my supervisor that we try to blast a single part to see if this will do the trick like Mfgenggear said.
But thank you all for your inputs.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
In the olden days (prior to Nitrogen/Methanol atmospheres), carburizing was usually done with "endo gas", that is, natural gas converted to as much CO as possible by passing methane and air over a heated catylist in regulated amounts at an elevated temperature. Since the CH4 + O2 --> CO + H2 + H20 reaction absorbs heat, that is is endothermic, the device is known as an endothermic generator, or endo generator and the gas was endo gas. By controlling the temperature the reaction takes place, the amount of hydrogen produced could be maximized and the amount of water minimized. In the furnace, methane was introduced to increase the carbon potential, which also increased the water content. The water content was monitored by checking the dew point of the furnace atmosphere. Endo gas is very reducing and will reduce iron oxide to iron. Endo gas is explosive below 1400F or so and will burn if exposed to oxygen.
Anyway, in the olden days, when carburizing with endo gas, you had to charge the furnace with an air atmosphere, since endo gas was explosive at lower temperatures. Even with such controls, it wasn't uncommon for a carburzing furnace to "blow its doors off" if there was a leak in the furnace. Since you couldn't introduce an atmosphere until the furnace was above 1500F, contamination would burn off and the parts would develop a light scale as the furnace temperature climbed back to its setpoint after charging. This wasn't a problem as once the atmosphere was introduced at 1500F, the scale would be reduced back to iron. This phenomena was noticeable on loads where some problem with the generator prevented introduction of the atmosphere and had to sit at 1500F or so for an extended period. In such cases, the dew point would be way off (high) for a couple of hours as the scale was reduced back to iron
My point (finally getting around to it) is that with the N2/Methanol systems, there is very little oxygen in the furnace when the load is charged (it has been purged with N2), so surface contamination may not burn off. In addition, the parts do not develop the light scale. Lyrl's suggestion would take care of this and might be worth investigating.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
RE: Case Hardening trouble
@Redpicker, thanks alot for going into details, its nice since im brand new in the branch and as said, "just" an intern.
I will check up on what we are using and make the suggestion next time we get this specific part in house again, if we have the issue.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
Typically the materials that are carbonized are low-carbon and alloy steels with initial carbon content ranging from 0.2 to 0.3%. The workpiece surface must be free from contaminants, such as oil oxides, alkaline solutions, which prevent or impede the diffusion of carbon into the workpiece surface.
RE: Case Hardening trouble
effects of rust on carburized surfaces on low alloy steels