×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wood Truss

Wood Truss

Wood Truss

(OP)
Got a wood truss spanning about 25', its about a 6:12 pitch. Is there a rule of thumb for the span/pitch and deflection? There is a wall at the center of the truss below, but I would not expect it to be load bearing, especially since over doorways, they didnt put headers in. Just wondering if they would have a wall to limit deflection?

RE: Wood Truss

For wood roof trusses, the deflection in inches due to live load cannot exceed the span in inches divided by 240 (L/240). For wood floor trusses, the deflection in inches due to live load cannot exceed the span in inches divided by 360 (L/360).

Creep can be up to 1/2 LL deflection

RE: Wood Truss

Usually, the deflection of moderate pitch roof trusses is not significant and is well above L/240

RE: Wood Truss

25' is no problem. Sloped trusses usually don't have big issues. You can run them 60' if you can get them on a truck.

(Very)General rule of thumb is X' span, X" deep. So 25' span needs 25" depth. You should have 6', so rock and roll.

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty but when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

-R. Buckminster Fuller

RE: Wood Truss

From my past experience as a wood truss designer, for typical loading scenarios, anything with a flat bottom and a pitch greater than about 4:12 tends to work just fine.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Truss

If they didn't install a slip joint at the top of the wall, it's likely that the wall is load bearing now to a certain degree, even if it wasn't intended that way.

RE: Wood Truss

If a panel point does not occur at that (intermediate) wall, the bottom chord of truss could experience undesirable stress.

RE: Wood Truss

(OP)
Thanks, I was pretty sure it would be ok. I have never come across a truss that is loadbearing in the center. Also especially since the openings below in the wall do not have a header.

Thanks

RE: Wood Truss

I've been in many a building where non-load bearing walls still have a header. Some carpenter's don't know any better and just frame every door opening the same.

RE: Wood Truss

My experience with one story wood framed buildings is the contractors build all of the interior walls tight to the underside of the trusses, without slip connections. It just seems to work. Maybe the trusses don't deflect much, maybe the interior walls become load bearing to a certain degree, maybe the bottom chord of the trusses flex upward, relieving the stress.

DaveAtkins

RE: Wood Truss

Quote (jrisebo)

I have never come across a truss that is loadbearing in the center.

In long-span situations, I've designed many buildings that have had intermediate (center) bearing points. Often, the truss manufacturer prefers it which, reportedly , would keep the cost down since they could avoid what would otherwise require a 2x8 or 2x10 bottom chord.

Quote (jayrod12)

I've been in many a building where non-load bearing walls still have a header.

I've seen this in smaller-span residential construction where the general contractor told me these are cookie-cutter houses that have previously been estimated and the material bill is constant.

Quote (DaveAtkins)

My experience with one story wood framed buildings is the contractors build all of the interior walls tight to the underside of the trusses, without slip connections. It just seems to work. Maybe the trusses don't deflect much, maybe the interior walls become load bearing to a certain degree

I've also seen this in smaller-span construction where i suppose deflection wasn't an issue. I also assume this was common practice in older construction where large spans were not in demand as today.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources